Comparative study of ultrasonographic and ultra-wide-field fundus for measurements of the diameter of choroidal and retinal tumors

Author:

Yang Qiong1,Wang Qian1,Yang Jingyan1,Wei Wen Bin2

Affiliation:

1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University

2. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University

Abstract

Abstract Background Measurement of the largest basal dimension (LBD) of intraocular tumors is important as a prognostic parameter. In order to evaluate the potential value of true color wide-field fundus photography in the measurement of tumors, we compared the measurements of the LBD of choroidal and retinal tumors by color ultra-wide-field fundus camera to clinical estimation based on indirect ophthalmoscopy and standardized ophthalmic ultrasound. Methods The LBD of 148 choroidal and retinal tumors of 148 patients seen at the Tongren Hospital were measured by ultra-wide-field fundus photography and compared with those measured by B-scan ultrasound and clinical estimation based on indirect ophthalmoscopy. Results Paired t-tests reveal that measurements from wide-field fundus photographic images are not statistically different from clinical estimation and ultrasound measurements. The results also showed that, although not statistically significant, when the tumor boundary was clear, the height ༜3 mm or the tumor was pigmented, the measurement value of wide-field fundus photography was greater than that measured by ultrasound. However, when the vitreous opacity, subretinal fluid or retinal detachment obscures the tumor, or the tumor is too large, or the tumor is located in the peripheral retina and close to the ciliary body, it is difficult to obtain accurate measurement by wide-field fundus photography. Conclusions The LBD measurement by wide-field fundus photography correlated well with ultrasonography and clinical estimation and could be used as a reliable tool for LBD measurement of choroidal and retinal tumors.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3