Dissecting Secondary Immunodeficiency: Identification of Primary Immunodeficiency within B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders
Author:
Palacios-Ortega María1, Guerra-Galán Teresa1, Jiménez-Huete Adolfo2, García-Aznar José María3, Pérez-Guzmán Marc1, Mansilla-Ruiz Maria Dolores1, Mendiola Ángela Villegas1, López Cristina Pérez1, Hornero Elsa Mayol1, Rodriguez Alejandro Peixoto1, Cortijo Ascensión Peña1, Polo Marta1, Morales Marta Mateo1, Mandly Eduardo Anguita1, Cárdenas Mª Cruz1, Carrero Alejandra4, García Carlos Jiménez1, Bolaños Estefanía1, Íñigo Belén1, Medina Fiorella1, Fuente-Muñoz Eduardo de la1, Ochoa-Grullón Juliana1, García-Solís Blanca5, García-Carmona Yolanda6, Fernández-Arquero Miguel1, Benavente-Cuesta Celina1, Diego Rebeca Pérez5, Rider Nicholas7, Sánchez-Ramón Silvia1
Affiliation:
1. Hospital Clínico San Carlos 2. Clínica Universidad de Navarra 3. Health in Code 4. Complutense University 5. IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, La Paz University Hospital 6. Mount Sinai Medical Center 7. Liberty University College of Osteopathic Medicine and Collaborative Health Partners
Abstract
Abstract
Distinguishing between primary (PID) and secondary (SID) immunodeficiencies, particularly in relation to hematological B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (B-CLPD), poses a major clinical challenge. We aimed to analyze and define the clinical and laboratory variables in SID to B-CLPD, identifying overlaps with late-onset PIDs, which could potentially improve diagnostic precision and prognostic assessment. We studied 37 clinical/laboratory variables in 151 patients with SID to B-CLPD. Patients were classified as “Suspected PID Group” when having recurrent-severe infections prior to the B-CLPD and/or hypogammaglobulinemia according to ESID criteria for PID. Bivariate association analyses showed significant statistical differences between “Suspected PID”- and “SID”-groups in 10 out of 37 variables analyzed, with “Suspected PID” showing higher frequencies of childhood recurrent-severe infections, family history of B-CLPD, significantly lower serum Free Light Chain (sFLC) and immunoglobulin concentrations, and lower total leukocyte, and switch-memory B-cell counts at baseline. Rpart machine learning algorithm was performed to potentially create a model to differenciate both groups. The model developed a decision tree with two major variables in order of relevance: sum κ + λ and history of severe-recurrent infections in childhood, with high sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 100%, and accuracy 91.8% for PID prediction. Identifying significant clinical and immunological variables can aid in the difficult task of recognizing late-onset PIDs among patients with SID to B-CLPD, emphasizing the value of a comprehensive immunological evaluation. The differences between “Suspected PID” and SID groups, highlights the need of early, tailored diagnostic and treatment strategies for personalized patient management and follow up.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
|
|