A New Transcranial Doppler Parameter for Intracranial Hypertension Assessment in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Author:

Brasil Sergio1ORCID,Romeijn Hannah2,Haspels Esther K.2,Paiva Wellingson3,Schaafsma Arjen2

Affiliation:

1. University of Sao Paulo: Universidade de Sao Paulo

2. Martini Hospital: Martini Ziekenhuis

3. Universidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina: Universidade de Sao Paulo Faculdade de Medicina

Abstract

Abstract Background: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is a noninvasive bedside tool for intracerebral hemodynamic assessments in multiple clinical scenarios. TCD, by means of measuring systolic and diastolic blood velocities allows the calculation of the pulsatility index (PI), a parameter that is correlated with intracranial pressure (ICP). Nevertheless, the predictive value of the PI for raised ICP appears to be low, since it is subjected to several, often confounding factors not related to ICP. Recently, the Pulsatile Apparent Resistance (PaR) was developed as a PI corrected for arterial blood pressure, reducing some of the confounding factors influencing PI. This study compares the predictive value of PaR versus PI for intracranial hypertension (IH, ICP >20 mmHg) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: Patients with TBI admitted to the neurocritical care unit who required invasive ICP were included prospectively within five days of admission. TCD measurements were performed in both middle cerebral arteries, allowing calculations of the PI and PaR. The discriminative power of these parameters for ICP ≥20 mmHg was assessed by calculating the area under the Receiver Operator Characteristics curve (AUC). Results: 93 patients were included. A total of 20 (22%) patients experienced IH. The discriminative power was low for PI (AUC 0.64, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.49 – 0.79) and moderate for PaR (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.63 – 0.86). With regard to subgroup analyses, the discriminative power of these parameters increased after exclusion of patients who had undergone a craniectomy. This was especially true for the PaR (AUC right side 0.88; CI 0,72 – 1,0) and PI (AUC right side 0.72; CI 0,44 – 1,0). Conclusion: In the present study, discriminative power of the PaR for IH was superior to the PI, especially in patients not having undergone craniectomy. The assessment of PaR may be an adjunct especially for improving timing on a neurosurgical intervention, but also for their monitoring after a neurosurgery is performed. Further studies are warranted to define its clinical application. Trial registration: NCT03144219, Registered 01 May 2017 Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03144219

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference38 articles.

1. How I manage intracranial hypertension;Robba C;Crit Care,2019

2. Brasil S, Nogueira RC, Salinet ASM et al. The contribution of intracranial pressure to human dynamic cerebral autoregulation after acute brain injury.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol2022.

3. Cerebral perfusion pressure;Smith M;Br J Anaesth,2015

4. 10 or 15 or 20 or 40 mmHg? What is Increased Intracranial Pressure and Who Said So?;Wijdicks EFM;Neurocrit Care,2022

5. Intracranial pressure thresholds in severe traumatic brain injury: Con: The injured brain is not aware of ICP thresholds!;Helbok R;Intensive Care Med,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3