Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Dental Surgery - Paris Cité University
2. Faculty of Dental Surgery, Paris Cité University
3. Université Paris Cité
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) for orthodontic bracket bonding.
Materials and Methods: 121 human teeth were randomly divided into 11 groups (n=11) according to the surface treatment applied (H3PO4 ± Transbond Plus (TSEP) or Scotchbond Universal (SU)), and the adhesive used (Riva LC HV (RIVA), Fuji Ortho (FUJI), and Transbond XT (TXT)). For each sample, a metal button was bonded. SBS tests were performed at one week and debonded specimens were observed for failure modes determination. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used to compare SBS differences and Fisher's exact test to analyse the failure modes (p<0.05).
Results: TSEP + FUJI and H3PO4+ SU + TXT showed the highest SBS values while H3PO4+ TSEP + RIVA showed the lowest value. Cohesive failure and mixed failure were found in the groups with SU and TXT and adhesive failure in the other groups.
Discussion/Conclusions: The bonding of orthodontic attachments to enamel could be performed with any of the three materials studied. The use of a universal adhesive in the bonding protocol could optimize the adhesion values. Clinical studies would be needed to confirm the results obtained.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. The evolution of bonding in orthodontics;Gange P;Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2015
2. Alzainal A H, Majud A S, Al-Ani A M, Mageet A O. Orthodontic bonding: review of the literature. Int J Dent 2020; 2020: 8874909.
3. A review of direct orthodontic bonding;Reynolds IR;Br J Orthod,1975
4. Testing adhesion of direct restoratives to dental hard tissue - a review;Salz U;J Adhes Dent,2010
5. A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives;Sharma S;J Orthod Sci,2014