Affiliation:
1. University of Ilorin
2. Ahmadu Bello University
3. University of Ibadan
4. Center for malaria and other tropical diseases
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Over the last two decades, global stakeholders and the Nigerian government have invested approximately $2 billion in malaria control, reducing parasite prevalence to 23% from 42% in 2010. However, there is a risk that the modest gains will be reversed due to unmet resource gaps. Backward integration is presented in this paper as a viable option for sustainable funding of malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria.
Methods: Following a critical appraisal of the resource profile and malaria expenditure, a conceptual framework on backward integration as a means of ensuring long-term supply of malaria intervention commodities was developed. The study analyzed secondary annual data from the National Malaria Elimination Programme to estimate commodity needs for the period 2018-2020, as well as total resources committed and the financial gap.
Findings: The funds needed to implement national malaria interventions from 2018 to 2020 totaled US$ 1,122,332,318, of which US$ 531,228,984 (47.3%) were funded. The Nigerian government contributed 2.5%, the Global Fund (26.7%), the President's Malaria Initiative [PMI] (16.5%), and the Department for International Development [DFID] (6.2%). The funding shortfall was $591,103,335, or 52.7% of the needs. Various funding scenarios were evaluated for their relative merits and limitations, including advocacy for more external funding, bank borrowing, increased domestic resources, and backward integration.
Interpretation: The study concluded that backward integration should be used, based on a government-led public-private partnership that will increase local production of malaria intervention commodities that are accessible and affordable through market-based demand and supply arrangements.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2022 [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2022. Accessed 15 April 2023.
2. World Health Organization. Global Malaria Programme. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 8 (2016–2018). Geneva: World Health Organization. ; 2018 [Internet]. WHO Publ. 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/9789241510035/en/.
3. Mugittu K, Abdulla S, Falk N, Masanja H, Felger I, Mshinda H et al. Improvements in access to malaria treatment in Tanzania following community, retail sector and health facility interventions -- a user perspective. Malar J [Internet]. 2005;4:55. Available from: http://malariajournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-2875-4-55.
4. World Health Organization, Aregawi M, Cibulskis RE, Otten M, Williams R. Global Malaria Programme. Surveillance M and EU. World malaria report 2009. World Health Organization; 2009. Accessed 14 April 2023.
5. Provider practice and user behavior interventions to improve prompt and effective treatment of malaria: Do we know what works?;Smith LA;Am J Trop Med Hyg,2009