New Benchmarks on Demographic Disparities in Pivotal Trials Supporting FDA Approved Drugs and Biologics

Author:

Smith Zachary1ORCID,Botto Emily1,Johnson Otis2,Getz Kenneth1

Affiliation:

1. Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development

2. Unaffiliated

Abstract

Abstract Background A lack of diversity and representation in clinical trials is an established issue in drug development, and the COVID-19 pandemic increased awareness of the problem among the general public. This awareness has led to increased pressure on drug development sponsors, as well as additional attention and regulation from federal bodies, to improve the diversity of clinical trials. This study updates existing baselines regarding demographic disparities, as well as detecting early signs that the situation may be starting to improve. Methods Building on an existing dataset, this study collected and analyzed pivotal trial demographic data for drugs and biologics approved by the FDA between 2007 and 2021. Demographic data were collected from applications on the FDA website and clinicaltrials.gov, and compared to indication-specific demographic data when available, or US Census estimates when they were not. Regression analyses were used to test for significant trends in reporting of demographic data and representation in pivotal trials, as well as the effect of representation on clinical trial duration and FDA review. Results Reporting of demographic data has improved significantly for all three demographic categories (sex, racial identity, and ethnic identity) over the observed time period (p < .0001). During this time period, overrepresentation of white participants has decreased significantly (p < .0001), and representation of Black participants has increased (p = .0003). Other racial and ethnic identities did not show significant trends. Representation of demographic subgroups were not significant predictors of trial duration except for the representation of Black participants, which was a negative correlation, indicating that as representation of Black participants increases, trial duration decreases (p = .0350).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference15 articles.

1. Quantifying Patient Subpopulation Disparities in New Drugs and Biologics Approved Between 2007 and 2017;Getz KA;Ther Innov Regul Sci,2020

2. Disparity of Race Reporting and Representation in Clinical Trials Leading to Cancer Drug Approvals From 2008 to 2018;Loree JM;JAMA Oncol,2019

3. Bierer BE, White SA, Meloney LG, Ahmed HR, Strauss DH, Clark LT. Achieving Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity in Clinical Research.: Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard (MRCT Center); 2021. Accessed June 15, 2023. https://mrctcenter.org/diversity-in-clinical-research/guidance/guidance-document/.

4. Striving for Diversity in Research Studies. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(15):1429–30. 10.1056/NEJMe2114651.

5. Diversity in Clinical and Biomedical Research: A Promise Yet to Be Fulfilled;Oh SS;PLOS Med,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3