Adherence enhancing interventions for pharmacological and oxygen therapy in patients with COPD: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analyses

Author:

Ammous Omar1ORCID,Andreas Stefan2,Friede Tim3,Kampo Regina3,Schwarz Sarah4,Wollsching-Strobel Maximilian4,Salem Susanna5,Windisch Wolfram4,Mathes Tim3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Statistics, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen

2. Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen/ Krs Kassel; Clinic for Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen

3. Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen

4. Cologne Merheim Hospital, Department of Pneumology

5. Department of Medical Statistcs, University Medical Center Göttingen

Abstract

Abstract Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterised by hyperinflation and expiratory airflow limitation due to long-term exposure to irritants. The variety and complexity of COPD treatment and the possible added comorbidities may make the patients find it difficult to cope with the required medications. That’s why supporting patients' adherence is critical because not taking medications correctly increases the risk of complications and creates an additional financial burden. A range of interventions aiming to improve patient adherence were used, and most of them are complex since they involve a mix of elements. Furthermore, despite the variety of available tools, assessing adherence is challenging because clinicians usually don’t get a concrete judgement if their patients followed their treatment plan reliably. Methods: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions for COPD patients, explore which intervention (component) works for which patients and check the factors influencing the implementation and participant responses. We will include all studies investigating the effect of adherence-enhancing intervention on patients with COPD. We plan to perform two patient interviews (one before and one after the systematic review) and follow a sequential approach to integrating qualitative and quantitative information. The first interview aims to understand patients’ needs and prioritise the selection of the outcomes. The second interview will be conducted after the evidence synthesis to present the results to patients. Two reviewers with complementary expertise will perform the screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. We will perform two meta-analyses: the first will be pair-wise random-effects meta-analyses to combine homogeneous studies. Secondly, we will perform random-effects component network meta-analyses to identify the most effective components and combinations of components. To determine the degree of complexity, we will use the iCAT_SR checklist, and then, following a logical model, we will group the interventions according to prespecified criteria. Discussion: This systematic review aims to point out the most effective and implementable adherence-enhancing interventions by using methods for synthesising evidence on complex interventions and involving COPD patients all along with the review process. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022353977

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference73 articles.

1. WHO. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 29]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-(copd).

2. GOLD. GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PREVENTION. DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF COPD [Internet]. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease - GOLD. 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 29]. Available from: https://goldcopd.org/2022-gold-reports-2/.

3. The economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Europe: results from a systematic review of the literature;Rehman AU;Eur J Health Econ HEPAC Health Econ Prev Care,2020

4. Understanding the impact of symptoms on the burden of COPD;Miravitlles M;Respir Res,2017

5. Srivastava K, Thakur D, Sharma S, Punekar YS. Systematic Review of Humanistic and Economic Burden of Symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. PharmacoEconomics. 2015 May 1;33(5):467–88.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3