Affiliation:
1. Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University
2. Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
Depending on gallstone size, this study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of SILC and TILC.
Material and methods
Patients with gallstones underwent cholecystectomy by a single surgeon in this single-centre retrospective study between June 2022 and October 2023.
Results
Of the 114 patients included in this study, 61 underwent SILC, and 53 underwent TILC. The pain score 6h, 24h post-operation was higher in the TILC group compared with the SILC group. Gallstone was divided into large (diameter > 2cm) and small group (diameter < 2cm), larger gallstones significantly increase operation duration in patients who receive SILC. For the TILC group, large gallstones significantly increased blood loss during operation, while operative duration, pain score, and hospitalization stay did not differ between the two groups. The blood volume and pain score were higher in the TILC group compared with the SILC group for patients with large gallstones.
Conclusion
In this study, SILC and TILC both had similar postoperative outcomes and reduced postoperative pain. Moreover, SILC might be a better option for patients with larger gallstones (diameter > 2 cm) and helps reduce blood loss and postoperative pain.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer;Stinton LM;Gut Liver,2012
2. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Open Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis: A Literature Review;Mannam R;Cureus,2023
3. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for giant gall stone: Report of two cases;Igwe PO;Int J Surg Case Rep,2020
4. Management of gallstones and its related complications;Portincasa P;Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol,2016
5. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy;Navarra G;Br J Surg,1997