Understanding antimicrobial resistance from the perspective of public policy: a multinational knowledge, attitude, and practice survey to determine global awareness

Author:

Balleste-Delpierre Clara1,Naing Soe Yu1,Wijk Max van1,Vila Jordi1

Affiliation:

1. Barcelona Institute for Global Health: Instituto de Salud Global Barcelona

Abstract

Abstract Background Minimizing the effect of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires an adequate policy response that relies on good governance and coordination. We have previously demonstrated a knowledge gap on infectious diseases within the general public, but equivalent data from a policy context are still lacking. The aim of this study is to have a better comprehension of how AMR is understood and perceived among policy makers and stakeholders in tackling AMR on a global level. Methods A digital survey was designed to capture the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) towards AMR. A self-reporting questionnaire was distributed to politicians, policy advisors and relevant stakeholders, and survey responses were collected between November 2020 and March 2021. Results A total of 351 individuals participated in this study with 80% from high-income countries (HIC) and 20% from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Fifteen different countries were represented, and the majority of participants were from the Netherlands, Spain and Myanmar. Overall, participants had sufficient knowledge regarding AMR and reported the importance of political willingness in tackling AMR. More than half (65%) of participants from LMIC reported antibiotics misuse, and almost half (48%) claimed to be unaware of this health problem. Politicians and stakeholders from LMIC demonstrated a higher knowledge on AMR but showed poor perception and attitude toward antimicrobial use compared to those from HIC regions. HIC participants emphasized the role of the veterinary sector in particular, as well as the environmental dissemination of antibiotics and drug residues. The lack of funding resources was especially reported by participants from LMIC. Conclusion Inter-regional differences in KAP regarding AMR exist among politicians, policy advisors and relevant stakeholders. Overall, participants demonstrated to have a sufficient level of knowledge and awareness of AMR. This study characterizes a multi-national policymaker and stakeholder mapping that can be used to propose further policy implementation on various governance levels.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3