On the usage of the Aviation Colour Code system at European Volcano Observatories: experiences and open questions
Author:
Barsotti Sara1ORCID, Scollo Simona2, Macedonio Giovanni3, Rielo Alicia Felpeto4, Peltier Aline5, Vougioukalakis Georgios6, Dalfsen Elske de Zeeuw - van7, Ottemöller Lars8, Pimentel Adriano9, Komorowski Jean-Christophe5, Loughlin Susan10, Carmo Rita9, Coltelli Mauro2, Corbeau Jordane11, Vye-Brown Charlotte10, Vito Mauro Di3, de Chabalier Jean-Bernard11, Ferreira Teresa9, Fontaine Fabrice R.11, Lemarchand Arnaud5, Marques Rui9, Medeiros Joana9, Moretti Roberto12, Pfeffer Melissa Anne13, Saurel Jean-Marie5, Vlastelic Ivan12, Vogfjörd Kristín13
Affiliation:
1. Icelandic Meteorological Office 2. INGV Catania: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia Sezione di Catania 3. INGV Napoli: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia Sezione di Napoli 4. IGN: Instituto Geografico Nacional 5. IPGP: Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris 6. HSGME 7. KNMI: Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut 8. University of Bergen Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences: Universitetet i Bergen Det Matematisk-naturvitenskapelige Fakultet 9. CIVISA-IVAR 10. British Geological Survey - Edinburgh Office 11. IPGP OVSM: Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris Observatoire Volcanologique et Sismologique de Martinique 12. IPGP OVSG: Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris Observatoire Volcanologique et Sismologique de Guadeloupe 13. IMO
Abstract
AbstractVolcano Observatories (VOs) around the world are required to maintain surveillance of their volcanoes and inform civil protection and aviation authorities about impending eruptions. They often work through consolidated procedures to respond to volcanic crises in a timely manner and provide a service to the community aimed at reducing the potential impact of an eruption. Within the International Airways Volcano Watch (IAVW) framework of the International Civil Aviation Organisation, designated State Volcano Observatories (SVOs) are asked to operate a colour coded system designed to inform the aviation community about the status of a volcano and the expected threats associated. Despite the IAVW documentation defining the different colour-coded levels, operating the Aviation Colour Code (ACC) in a standardised way is not easy, as sometimes, different SVOs adopt different strategies on how, when, and why to change it. Following two European VOs and Volcanic Ash Advisory Centres (VAACs) workshops, the European VOs agreed to present an overview on how they operate the ACC. The comparative analysis presented here reveals that not all VOs in Europe use the ACC as part of their operational response, mainly because of a lack of volcanic eruptions since the ACC was officially established, or the absence of a formal appointment as an SVO. We also note that the VOs, which do regularly adopt ACC, operate differently depending on the frequency and styles of eruptions, the historical eruptive activity, the nature of the unrest, the monitoring level, and also on the agreement they may have with the local Air Transport Navigation providers. This study shows that even though the ACC system was designed to provide a standard, its usage strongly depends on the evaluation of the actors responding to the volcano emergencies. Some common questions have been identified across the different (S)VOs that will need to be addressed by ICAO in order to have a more harmonised approach and usage of the ACC.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Aspinall WP, Loughlin SC, Michael FV, Miller AD, Norton GE, Rowley KC, Sparks RSJ, Young SR (2002) The Montserrat Volcano Observatory: its evolution, organisation, role and activities. In: ‘The eruption of Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat, from 1995 to 1999’. Memoir of the Geological Society of London. Druitt. T.H., Kokelaar B.P and. Young S.R (Eds). https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.MEM.2002.021.01.04 2. Baker PE, Gass IG, Harris PG, Maitre L, R. W (1964) The volcanological report of the Royal Society expedition to Tristan da Cunha, 1962: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, p 256 3. Quantitative assessment of volcanic ash hazards for health and infrastructure at Mt. Etna (Italy) by numerical simulation;Barsotti S;J Volcanol Geotherm Res,2010 4. The eruption in Fagradalsfjall (2021, Iceland): how the operational monitoring and the volcanic hazard assessment contributed to its safe access;Barsotti S;Nat Hazards,2023 5. Operational response and hazards assessment during the 2014–2015 volcanic crisis at Bárðarbunga volcano and associated eruption at Holuhraun, Iceland;Barsotti S;J Volcanol Geoth Res,2020
|
|