The Comparison of Accuracy between Traditional Logistic Regression and Gradient Boosting Classifier Model of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Diabetes Kidney Disease in Chinese – A 4-year Longitudinal Study

Author:

Wu Chung-Ze1,Lin Chung-Yu2,Chen Fang-Yu2,Kuo Chun-Heng2,Chen Jin-Shuen3,Pitrone Pietro4,Huang Li-Ying2

Affiliation:

1. Taipei Medical University

2. Fu Jen Catholic University

3. Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

4. Papardo Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been increasing recently in Taiwan which causes 43% of the total population of dialysis. In the present study, our goal was to compare the accuracy of logistic regression (LR) and gradient boosting classification (GBC) of artificial intelligence in predicting diabetes kidney disease (DKD) in a Chinese cohort. Methods: Totally, there were 365 men and 320 women with T2D enrolled and followed for four years. They were further divided into quintiles according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Both LR and GBC were used to estimate the future DKD. Simple correlation was applied to evaluate the correlation between factors and eGFR at the end of follow-up (eGFR-FU). Sixty percent participants, as training group, were randomly sampled. The others were the validation group. The equations obtained from the training group of both methods are applied to calculate the receiver operation curve (ROC) of the validation group. Results: At the end of the follow-up, the eGFR-FU significantly different in both genders. The baseline eGFR is negatively related to age, duration of T2D, low density lipoprotein, ALT, systolic blood pressure, but positively related to fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and creatinine in men. In women, the relationship of FPG disappears. The ROC for LR is 0.88 and for GBC is 0.97 for men, and 0.82 and 0.94 for women, respectively. Both findings reach statistically significance. Conclusion: In conclusion, GBC could provide a better prediction compared to traditional LR in patients with T2D followed up for 4 years.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3