Liver Injury in Children: Signal Analysis of Suspected Drugs Based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

Author:

Liu Yan1,Li Hailong1,Huang Liang1,Wan Chaomin2,Wang Huiqing2,Jiao Xuefeng1,Zeng Linan1,Jia Zhijun1,Cheng Guo2,Zhang Lei3,Zhang Wei4,Zhang Lingli1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University

2. Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University

3. College of Computer Science, Sichuan University

4. West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Evidence of drug-induced liver injury is abundant in adults but is lacking in children. Our aim was to identify suspected drug signals associated with pediatric liver injury. Methods Hepatic adverse events (HAEs) among children entered into the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System were analyzed. A descriptive analysis was performed to summarize pediatric HAEs, and a disproportionality analysis was conducted by evaluating reporting odds ratios (RORs) and proportional reporting ratios to detect suspected drugs. Results Here, 14,143 pediatric cases were reported, specifically 49.6% in males, 45.1% in females, and 5.2% unknown. Most patients (68.8%) were 6–18 years old. Hospitalization ranked first among definite outcomes (7,207 cases, 37.2%). In total, 264 disproportionate drug signals were identified. The top 10 drugs by the number of reports were paracetamol (1,365; ROR, 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.4–3.8), methotrexate (878; ROR, 2.5; 95%CI, 2.3–2.7), vincristine (649; ROR, 3.0; 95%CI, 2.8–3.3), valproic acid (511; ROR, 3.2; 95%CI, 2.9–3.6), cyclophosphamide (490; ROR, 2.4; 95%CI, 2.2–2.6), tacrolimus (427; ROR, 2.4; 95%CI, 2.2–2.7), prednisone (416; ROR, 2.1; 95%CI, 1.9–2.3), prednisolone (401; ROR, 2.3; 95%CI, 2.1–2.5), etoposide (378; ROR, 2.3; 95%CI, 2.1–2.6), and cytarabine (344; ROR, 2.8; 95%CI, 2.5–3.2). After excluding validated hepatotoxic drugs, six were newly detected, specifically acetylcysteine, thiopental, temazepam, nefopam, primaquine, and pyrimethamine. Conclusion The hepatotoxic risk associated with 264 signals needs to be noted in practice. The causality of hepatotoxicity and mechanism among new signals should be verified with preclinical and clinical studies.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference65 articles.

1. Drug-induced liver injury;Andrade RJ;Nature reviews Disease primers,2019

2. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury;Chalasani NP;The American journal of gastroenterology,2021

3. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury;Yu Y;Journal of Practical Hepatology,2017

4. Incidence and Etiology of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Mainland China;Shen T;Gastroenterology,2019

5. A prospective nationwide study of drug-induced liver injury in Korea;Suk KT;The American journal of gastroenterology,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3