Differences of patient empowerment between elective and contracted physicians in internal medicine in Austria: a quantitative content analysis

Author:

Simetsberger Bettina1,Pferzinger Manfred1,Waiguny Martin K. J.1

Affiliation:

1. IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems

Abstract

Abstract Background Physicians impact and promote patient empowerment at various levels. Specialized ambulatory care is provided by either elective physicians or contracted physicians in Austria, which is unique internationally. The difference between the two groups is due to the contractual relationship with the social health insurance providers. This paper researches whether there are also differences in the promotion of patient empowerment between elective and contracted physicians in internal medicine in Vienna based on four dimensions of patient empowerment. Methods A quantitative content analysis analyzes the comments on DocFinder.at to identify the differences between the two groups. A deductive inductive approach based on the literature as the comments on DocFinder.at, led to a codebook with seven categories and forty-eight variables. In total of 1,153 comments collated, 912 have been relevant for further analysis. Differences between elective and contracted physicians became evident through defined dimensions of patient empowerment. Results Three out of four dimensions show clear differences between elective and contracted physicians. In health literacy, self-management and communication elective physicians exhibit more conducive conditions for patient empowerment compared to contracted physicians. In particular we observe differences in the communication-relevant factors and in the transfer of information. The time spent by physicians is a decisive factor in this context and is one of the key factors in choosing an elective over a contracted physician. Conclusions The findings serve suggest avenues for further research. Our results suggest that elective physicians tend to create more conducive framework conditions for patient empowerment compared to contracted physicians, however our findings are also limited by the method used so future research might address it with different approaches like surveys or experiments.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3