Adaptation of a model for integration of interventions for alcohol use disorder in primary health care in Tanzania

Author:

Mushi Dorothy1,Hanlon Charlotte2,Francis Joel M3,Candida Moshiro1,Demissie Mekdes4,Teferra Solomon4

Affiliation:

1. Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences

2. King's College London

3. University of the Witwatersrand

4. Addis Ababa University

Abstract

Abstract Integrating evidence-based interventions for people with alcohol use disorder (AUD) into primary healthcare (PHC) can increase access to care and reduce morbidity, mortality, and population burden. However, for the integration to be feasible, acceptable, and sustainable, there is a need to contextualize the approach and involve stakeholders. Therefore, this study aimed to use participatory methods to adapt a model for integrating AUD interventions in Tanzania’s PHC system at the community, facility, and organizational levels. Methods A mixed-methods study was used. Participants include key mental health stakeholders, experts, and PHC providers. We conducted a situational analysis to investigate opportunities and constraints in the existing systems of care, utilizing data available from the routine collection and/or in the public domain; individual semi-structured interviews (n = 11), and focus group discussions (3 groups; total n = 26 participants) and a series of theory of change (ToC) workshops (n = 32). Data from the three methods were triangulated to develop the adapted model for integrating interventions for AUD in PHC. Results The consensus long-term outcome of the Theory of Change map is to improve the physical, mental health, and social well-being of people treated for AUD to increase productivity in the community. Necessary interventions for the community were identified as awareness-raising, improving access to care, community engagement, and resource mobilization. Facility interventions included capacity building to strengthen staff competencies and supportive supervision. Organizational level interventions included strengthening infrastructure for the mental health service delivery system and financing. Identified facilitators for implementing the intervention packages were leveraging existing health system resources and recognizing that mental health was part of PHC. Potential barriers included an under-resourced health system, reflected in an inadequate number of HCPs in the community and facility and inadequate prioritization of mental health care. Conclusions The intervention packages for an adapted model for integrating AUD interventions in PHC in Tanzania have been identified, as well as their potential barriers and facilitators to the feasibility of implementation. There is a need to pilot the adapted model to inform plans for wider implementation or scaling up.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3