An analysis of Medical Emergency Team (MET) activated events and goals of care trajectories across the General Medical In-patient journey

Author:

Perera Padeepa1,Rotherham Hannah2,Fazio Timothy2,Johnson Douglas2,Presneill Jeffrey2

Affiliation:

1. University of Melbourne

2. Royal Melbourne Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background/Aims: We aimed to evaluate the characteristics, predictors for, and outcomes of Medical Emergency Team (MET) activated events, and identify associations with Goals of Care (GOC) changes across the General Medical admission. Methods: A 12-month retrospective observational study was conducted at Royal Melbourne Hospital (January-December-2021), comparing General Medical admissions requiring METs versus those not. Results: 423 (9.2%) of 4594 identified admissions required METs; MET patients had higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score (2 vs 1), ICU admission (19.4% vs 5.5%), and length of stay (16.6 vs 5.8 days). MET patients were associated with increased inpatient mortality (9.9% vs 1.6%), more conservative GOC at admission end (45.4% vs 35.5% GOC C/D), and only 44.4% (vs 70.9%) were discharged to independent living. The most significant independent predictor for METs was higher CCI score: Score 1-2; OR 1.63 (p=0.01), Score >=3; OR 3.61 (p=<0.001). Increasing age (by decade) was associated with reduced METs (OR 0.89, p=0.01). Higher CCI score was also associated with increased in-patient mortality: Score 1-2; OR 5.51 (p=0.01), Score >=3; OR 15.35 (p=<0.001). The occurrence of a MET (OR 0.25, p=<0.001), higher CCI score (CCI>=3; OR 0.44, p=<0.001), and advancing age (>=90 years; OR 0.24, p=<0.001) were independently associated with increased conservative GOC at admission end. Conclusion: General Medical inpatients requiring METs had higher co-morbidities, length of stay and inpatient mortality, with less likelihood of discharge to independent living. Increasing CCI score was an independent predictor for METs, in-patient mortality, and a change towards more conservative GOC at admission end.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3