Evaluating a shared care pathway intervention to reduce chemotherapy outpatients’ unplanned presentations to hospital: a randomised controlled trial

Author:

Fethney Judith1,Kim Bora1,Boustany Chantale1,McKenzie Heather1,Hayes Lillian1,Cox Keith2,Simpson Judy M3,Horvath Lisa G2,Vardy Janette L4,McLeod Jodi4,Willcock Simon5,Cook Natalie6,Acret Louise1,White Kate1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Sydney

2. Chris O’Brien Lifehouse

3. University of Sydney

4. Sydney Local Health District

5. Macquarie University Hospital, Primary Care

6. Healthdirect Australia

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) was to explore whether a community nursing intervention for outpatients receiving systemic therapy reduced unplanned hospital presentations and improved physical and psychosocial health outcomes over the first three cycles of treatment compared to a control group receiving standard care. Methods The number of and reasons for unplanned presentations were obtained for 170 intervention and 176 control group patients. Patients self-completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Cancer Behavior Inventory and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at the start of the first four cycles. Poisson regression was used to compare the number of presentations between the intervention and control groups. Linear regression techniques were used to compare quality of life outcomes. Results The relative difference in unplanned presentations between the control and intervention groups was 12% (95% CI: −25%, 37%; P = 0.48) in favour of the intervention. At the start of cycle 4, there was no difference in anxiety (difference = 0.47 (95%CI: −0.28 to 1.22; P = 0.22)), depression (difference = 0.57 (95%CI:−0.18 to 1.31; P = 0.13)) or EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score (difference = 0.16 (95%CI:−2.67, 3.00; P = 0.90)). Scores for self-efficacy as measured by the Cancer Behavior Inventory were higher in the intervention group (difference = 4.3 (95%CI:0.7 to 7.9; P = 0.02). Conclusion This RCT did not demonstrate a benefit in reducing unplanned presentations to hospital. The trial identified improved cancer-based self-efficacy in patients receiving the intervention.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference45 articles.

1. A roadmap for comparing readmission policies with application to Denmark, England, Germany and the United States;Kristensen SR;Health Policy,2015

2. Department of Health. Keeping Australians Out of Hospital. 2019; Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/keeping-australians-out-of-hospital. Accessed 28 September 2020.

3. Council of Australian Governments (2018) Heads of Agreement between the Commonwealth and the States and Territories on public hospital funding and health reform. 2018: Australia. https://federation.gov.au/about/agreements/heads-agreement-between-commonwealth-and-states-and-territories-public-hospital. Accessed 28 September 2020.

4. NSW Health, KPI and Improvement Measure, NSW Government, Editor. 2019: Australia. https://www1.health.nsw.gov.au/pds/ArchivePDSDocuments/IB2018_048.pdf. Accessed 28 September, 2020.

5. Chemotherapy outpatients' unplanned presentations to hospital: a retrospective study;McKenzie H;Support Care Cancer,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3