Structural Vulnerability Factors Influence Gestational Weight Gain in a Broad Range of Contexts: A Scoping Review

Author:

Labonté Jocelyne M1,Clark Emily1,Dumas Alex1,Savard Claudia2,Fournier Karine1,O’Connor Sarah2,Morisset Anne-Sophie2,Fontaine-Bisson Bénédicte1

Affiliation:

1. University of Ottawa

2. Université Laval

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Insufficient and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) are rising epidemiological health concerns, affecting the majority of pregnant women in high-income countries and contributing to a multitude of adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. Objective: The aim of this scoping review was to identify key structural vulnerability factors related to GWG in order to examine the extent, scope and nature of this body of research and to inform future methodological approaches. Data sources: Electronic searches were performed in October 2018 (updated in August 2019) in MEDLINE(R) ALL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Sociological Abstracts databases. Study selection: Studies had to be conducted before COVID-19, in a high-income country, have pregnant participants, have an observational design, and perform inferential statistics between a structural vulnerability factor and GWG. Results: Of the 11,382 citations identified through database searches, 157 articles were included in the review. The structural vulnerability factors most commonly studied in association with GWG were race/ethnicity (n=91 articles), age (n=87), parity (n=48), education (n=44), income (n=39), marital status (n=28), immigration (n=19), and abuse (n=12). Moststudies were conducted in the USA (77%) and reported significant associations between structural vulnerability factors and GWG; 34% of studies were specific to a population where all individuals were affected by one of more structural vulnerability factors. Race/ethnicity was the most extensively studied factor, covering the longest time period (since 1976), being assessed in the highest number of articles (n=91) with the largest sample size (n=7,966,573), and having a high proportion (79%) of studies reporting a significant relationship with GWG. Conclusions: Adopting an intersectional approach may enhance our understanding of the complex interplay between social context, structural vulnerability factors, and GWG. Recognizing their long-term health consequences during pregnancy, increased social, structural, and policy efforts should support pregnant women in achieving optimal GWG.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3