Affiliation:
1. Rigshospitalet
2. Oslo universitetssykehus Rikshospitalet
3. University of Southern Denmark: Syddansk Universitet
4. University Hospital of North Norway: Universitetssykehuset Nord-Norge HF
5. Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Trial Unit
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Insertion of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is a first-line treatment of acute hydrocephalus caused by aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). Once the patient is clinically stable, the EVD is either removed or replaced by a permanent internal shunt. The optimal strategy for cessation of the EVD is unknown. Prompt closure carries a risk of acute hydrocephalus or redundant shunt implantations, whereas gradual weaning may increase the risk of EVD-related infections.
Methods: DRAIN (Danish RAndomised Trial of External Ventricular Drainage Cessation IN Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage) is an international multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing prompt closure versus gradual weaning of the EVD after aSAH. The primary outcome is composite of VP-shunt implantation, all-cause mortality, or EVD-related infection. Secondary outcomes are serious adverse events excl. mortality and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Exploratory outcomes are modified Rankin Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended, and length of stay in the neurointensive care unit and hospital. Outcome assessment will be performed 6 months after ictus. Based on the sample size calculation (event proportion 80% in the gradual weaning group, relative risk reduction 20%, alpha 5%, power 80%) 122 participants are required in each intervention group. Outcome assessment for the primary outcome, statistical analyses, and conclusion drawing will be blinded. Two independent statistical analyses and reports will be tracked using a version control system, and both will be published. Based on the final statistical report, the blinded Steering Group will formulate two abstracts.
Conclusion: We present a pre-defined statistical analysis plan for the randomised DRAIN trial, which limits bias, p-hacking, and data-driven interpretations. This statistical analysis plan is accompanied by tables with simulated data, which increases transparency and reproducibility.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03948256
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Pavesi G, Nasi D, Moriconi E, Stanzani R, Puzzolante A, Lucchesi L et al. Management and safety of intraoperative ventriculostomy during early surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) [Internet]. Springer Vienna; 2022;164:2909–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05346-z.
2. Subarachnoid haemorrhage: diagnosis, causes and management;Gijn J;Brain,2001
3. fMRI of working memory impairment after recovery from subarachnoid hemorrhage;Ellmore TM;Front Neurol,2013
4. Predictors of Shunt-dependent Hydrocephalus After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;Xie Z;World Neurosurg Elsevier Inc,2017
5. Comparison of rapid and gradual weaning from external ventricular drainage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective randomized trial;Klopfenstein JD;J Neurosurg,2004