Evolution and Comparison of Three Typical Permanent Magnet Machines for All-Electric Aircraft Propulsion

Author:

Long Dingbang1,Wen Honghui1,Shao Yulong1,Shuai Zhikang1

Affiliation:

1. Hunan University

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, three typical permanent magnet machines for All-Electric aircraft propulsion are designed, optimized and compared. Firstly, the necessary performances are determined based on the requirements of high power/torque density and an aircraft with a maximum takeoff weight of 1500 kg. The initial structures of interior permanent magnet synchronous (IPM) machine, vernier permanent magnet (VPM) machine and flux-switching permanent magnet (FSPM) machine are designed with identical stator radius and rotor shaft length. Then, parametric sensitivity analysis and multi-objective particle swarm are combined as an optimization methodology to optimize these machines. Based on the finite element analysis, the electromagnetic performances such as no-load airgap flux density harmonic spectrum, cogging torque, average output torque, losses, efficiency and power factor etc. are generally compared and analyzed. Subsequently, the discussions are carried out, where the strength and weakness of these three machines are concluded and the future prospects are suggested. Finally, it is concluded that if effective measures are implemented to reduce the permanent magnet eddy current loss and improve the power factor, the VPM machine would be the most suitable choice among these machines for All-Electric aircraft propulsion.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference20 articles.

1. More electricity in the air: toward optimized electrical networks embedded in more-electrical aircraft;Roboam X;IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag.,2012

2. Review, challenges, and future developments of electric taxiing systems;Lukic M;IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif.,2019

3. Overview of electric motor technologies used for more electric aircraft (MEA);Cao W;IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,2012

4. Large electric machines for aircraft electric propulsion;Zhang X;IET Electr. Power Appl.,2018

5. Slingerland R and Zandstra S (2007) Bleed air versus electric power off-takes from a turbofan gas turbine over the flight cycle. in Proc. AIAA ATIO, pp. 7848–7854.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3