Abstract
PURPOSE
In the era of digital information, people commonly turn to the internet for knowledge about medical conditions like TMJ arthrocentesis, often utilizing platforms such as YouTube. However, the absence of strict regulations on YouTube questions the reliability of the available content. Hence, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the scientific accuracy of YouTube videos addressing TMJ arthrocentesis.
Top of Form
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study analyzed50 videos related to TMJ arthrocentesis by three Oral and Maxillofacial surgeons. Data on the video source, duration, upload date, time elapsed since upload, total views, likes, dislikes, comments, interaction index, and viewing rate were collected and analyzed. Video quality was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information (DISCERN).
RESULTS
Out of the 50 videos, 10 used the single-needle technique, while the remaining 40 used the 2-needle technique. Following joint irrigation, medications such as steroids were used in 10 videos, hyaluronic acid in 5, and IPRF in one. The mean total number of video views was 137,419.16, with a mean interaction index of 1.51 and a mean viewing rate of 2,803.28. The mean GQS and DISCERN scores were 2.25, and 1.94 respectively.
CONCLUSION
YouTube can be a valuable resource for learning, it should not replace formal education or hands-on training if you plan to perform TMJ arthrocentesis as a medical professional. Always consult with experts and follow best practices when performing medical procedures.