Evaluating Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in NHS Talking Therapies for Anxiety and Depression: A Framework Analysis of PPI Experience and Development of Good Practice Guidelines

Author:

Verbist Irini1,Fabian Hannah1,Huey Dale1,Brooks Helen2,Blakemore Amy2

Affiliation:

1. Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

2. University of Manchester

Abstract

Abstract Background Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research is increasingly growing. Despite the potential benefits of receiving service-user feedback within healthcare services, PPI remains limited in the context of psychological therapies services. Six PPI meetings, aiming to improve treatment engagement, were held in an NHS Talking Therapies service in Northwest England. The aim of the study is to evaluate the PPI experience and to develop good practice guidelines, hoping to encourage PPI activity within Talking Therapies services. Methods The study adopted a qualitative focus group design using a semi-structured topic guide. Five participants were recruited from the PPI meetings, all of whom were ex-service users. Framework analysis, incorporating both inductive and deductive coding, was applied to the transcript. The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) INVOLVE standards were used as the predetermined themes, namely, respect, support, transparency, responsiveness, fairness of opportunity and accountability. Results The members reported an overall positive PPI experience. Acknowledgement of PPI contribution, receiving adequate guidance and flexibility, and acquiring new knowledge increased members’ feelings of empowerment. It was also emphasised that being provided with detailed information about the process and role expectations, as well as enabling inclusivity, encouraged engagement and active participation. The members also offered some suggestions for future involvement, such as ensuring diverse recruitment and discretion. In addition, a new standard was added, “Safe Space”, underscoring the importance of creating a welcoming environment when involving people with past or present mental health difficulties. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study presenting good practice guidelines to facilitate the recruitment, engagement, empowerment, and impact of PPI activity in Talking Therapies services. By providing this guidance, we hope that researchers and clinical staff will be encouraged to involve service users in the decision-making of Talking Therapies service improvement.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference48 articles.

1. Facilitating public and patient involvement in basic and preclinical health research;Maccarthy J;PLoS ONE,2019

2. Health Research Authority. Public Involvement [Internet] 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/best-practice/public-involvement/.

3. Reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research publications: using the GRIPP2 checklists with lay co-researchers;Jones J;Res Involv Engagem,2021

4. Department of Health and Social Care. A framework for mental health research [Internet] 2017 [cited 2023 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-framework-for-mental-health-research.

5. Power to the people: to what extent has public involvement in applied health research achieved this?;Green G;Res Involv Engagem,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3