Optimal sample trees diameter distribution in developing allometric biomass models

Author:

Dutcă Ioan1,McRoberts Ronald E.2

Affiliation:

1. Transilvania University of Brasov

2. University of Minnesota

Abstract

Abstract Background: Improving forest biomass and carbon estimates is essential for sustaining the mitigation of climate change efforts in the forestry sector. An important source of uncertainty in forest estimates originates in the allometric model predictions. When developing allometric biomass models, the tree selection process is an important step that affects the model’s predictive performance. Typically, the diameter at breast height (D) range of the species is divided into D-classes, followed by random selection of sample trees within the D-classes; the number of trees in each D-class defines the sample tree D-distribution. Here, using a simulation study, we compared six types of sample tree D-distributions with respect to the precision of estimates of mean population biomass that the models produced. Results: The results showed that randomly selecting from each D-class a number of trees that is proportional to the basal area in that specific D-class in the population (i.e., sample trees were selected to produce a distribution of basal area in the sample that matched the distribution in the population) was the optimal D-distribution of the sample trees for minimizing the standard errors of the estimates of the population mean for a given sample size. When a-priori information about the distribution of tree attributes in the population is unknown, a uniform D-distribution represents a good alternative to the optimal sample D-distribution. Although producing the greatest precision of the estimate, the optimal D-distribution of sample trees did not produce models with the most accurate model fit (greatest coefficient of determination), suggesting that model fit alone is not a sufficient indicator of model’s predictive performance. Conclusions: The sample tree D-distribution affected considerably the precision of estimates of mean population biomass that the models produced. Therefore, to optimize the tree selection, and, therefore, to develop the models that produce precise estimators of the population mean, we recommend using an optimal D-distribution of the sample trees.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference36 articles.

1. Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2017 Apr 19];333:988–93. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21764754.

2. The European forest carbon budget under future climate conditions and current management practices;Pilli R;Biogeosciences,2022

3. Grassi G, Pilli R, House J, Federici S, Kurz WA. Science-based approach for credible accounting of mitigation in managed forests. Carbon Balance Manag [Internet]. 2018;13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0096-2.

4. Grassi G, House J, Dentener F, Federici S, den Elzen M, Penman J. The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation. Nat Clim Chang [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Nov 29];7:220–6. http://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate3227.

5. Jucker T, Caspersen J, Chave J, Antin C, Barbier N, Bongers F et al. Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes. Glob Chang Biol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Mar 6];23:177–90. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/gcb.13388.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3