Pre-service science teachers’ preference of methods in a teaching-learning transaction

Author:

MHLONGO THABO1ORCID,Sedumedi Thomas Dipogiso1

Affiliation:

1. TSHWANE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Abstract

Abstract Teachers in science education use various teaching methods in different topics. Practical work activities (PWAs) and traditional direct teaching methods (DTMs) are common in science education classrooms. This paper reports on an exploratory study conducted among pre-service science teachers’ (PSTs) preferences of two teaching methods for their learning. The study explored associative relations between students’ preferences of methods with their achievements, in specific science topics at two levels of a teacher training course. The study adopted a cohort design. A quantitative descriptive data analysis of preference scores against achievement for each method to establish relations used. The outcome indicated that, on individual basis, some associative relations exist between method preferences and student achievement for particular students. Most students prefer the PWAs to the DTMs and students who prefer DTMs are more adapted to both methods than students who prefer the PWAs. Thus, from these relations, the researchers can conclude that adaptation or maturation to teaching methods plays a role in student learning. Therefore, teachers may have to consider these varied outcomes as important for instructional design purposes and the selection of teaching methods for different cohorts of students.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference54 articles.

1. Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science;Abrahams I;International Journal of Science Education,2000

2. Evaluation of a school-based HIV prevention among Yemeni adolescents;Al-Iryani B;BMC Public Health,2011

3. Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia?;Azevedo R;Journal of Educational Psychology,2004

4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

5. “Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers' ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking;Barnhart T;Teaching and Teacher Education,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3