Childhood and demographic predictors of life evaluation, life satisfaction, and happiness: A cross-national analysis of the Global Flourishing Study

Author:

Lomas Tim1ORCID,Koga Hayami1,Padgett R.1,Pawelski James2ORCID,Kim Eric3,Makridis Christos4,Gundersen Craig5,Bradshaw Matt5,Pertel Noémie Le1,Shiba Koichiro6ORCID,Johnson Byron5,VanderWeele Tyler1

Affiliation:

1. Harvard University

2. University of Pennsylvania

3. University of British Columbia

4. Stanford University; University of Nicosia

5. Baylor University

6. Boston University

Abstract

Abstract

Subjective wellbeing has increasingly attracted attention across academia and beyond (e.g., policy making). However, the research literature has various shortcomings, including (1) conceptual confusion around key constructs, (2) limited and fragmented understanding of contextual dynamics, and (3) a lack of cross-cultural consideration. This paper reports on data from an ambitious research endeavour capable of redressing these three issues: the Global Flourishing Study (GFS), an intended five-year (minimum) panel study investigating the predictors of human flourishing. In addressing the aforementioned issues, first, the GFS has separate items for three constructs at the heart of subjective wellbeing that are often used interchangeably but are actually distinct: life evaluation; life satisfaction, and happiness. Second, the GFS enables an analysis of the association with these constructs of 15 contextual factors (eight relating to childhood, four demographic, and three pertaining to both). Third, the GFS includes (in this first year) 202,898 participants from 22 geographically and culturally diverse countries. Regarding contextual factors, all 15 had a significant association with all three outcome variables, with the largest variation observed being for self-reported health among the childhood predictors and employment status among the demographic factors. Significantly though, the overall patterns were not uniform across countries, suggesting the trends observed are not inevitable or universal, but are contingent on socio-cultural factors. The findings provide a better understanding of, and the foundation for future work on, the conceptual, contextual, and cross-cultural dynamics of this important topic.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference108 articles.

1. Stiglitz, J. E. Measuring What Counts: The Global Movement for Well-Being. (The New Press, 2019).

2. Stiglitz, J. E., Fitoussi, J. P. & Durand, M. Beyond GDP: Measuring What Counts for Economic and Social Performance. (OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 2018).

3. World Health Organization. Joint Meeting of Experts on Targets and Indicators for Health and Well-Being in Health 2020. (World Health Organization Regional Office of Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2013).

4. The Global Council for Happiness and Wellbeing. Global Happiness and Wellbeing Policy Report. (Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York, 2019).

5. Durand, M. & Exton, C. Adopting a Well-Being Approach in Central Government: Policy Mechanisms and Practical Tools. (Global Happiness and Wellbeing Policy Report, 2019).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3