Comparative Outcomes of different interventions in ARDS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author:

Xu Zhiyuan1,Liu Haonan2,Zhou Shuaishuai3,Zhang Ruiqi1,Meng Chao4,Li Shengli5,Liu Xiao1,Yan Xianliang1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province 221006, China

2. Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province 221006, China

3. Department of Cardiovascular, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu Province 221006, China

4. Department of Neurosurgery,Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province 221006, China

5. Medical Record Statistics Department, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province 221006, China

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is linked to high rates of morbidity and mortality. Evidence examining commonly used corticosteroids, neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) and inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) remains uncertain. The aim of the study was to compare and rank these three treatments to identify the best one. DATA SOURCES: We searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from the earliest records to May 1, 2022 for clinic trials. STUDY SELECTIONT AND DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical trials of three interventions compared with control group for ARDS, no language restricted. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Frequentist network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed to identify the best intervention and treatments were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes varied ventilator-free days at 28 days, ICU mortality, In-hospital mortality and new infection events. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were combined from 26 clinical trials which included 5071 patients. Vecuronium bromide was the best strategy to reduce 28-day mortality compared with the conventional treatment, iNO, methylprednisolone and placebo (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-1.00 and OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10-0.85 and OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.74 and OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.65; SUCRA: 96.6%). Dexamethasone was the best treatment option for increasing ventilator-free days at 28 days compared to conventional therapy and cisatracurium (MD 3.60, 95% CI 1.77-5.43 and MD 3.40, 95% CI 0.87-5.92; SUCRA: 93.2%). Methylprednisolone was the most effective treatment option to prevent ICU mortality (SUCRA: 88.5%). Though dexamethasone, cisatracurium, conventional therapy, methylprednisolone and iNO treatment showed no significant superiority of in-hospital mortality protection over placebo, suggesting that it had the highest probability of being the best treatment option (SUCRA: 79.7%) for reducing in-hospital mortality. Dexamethasone treatment showed the highest safety for decreasing the incidence of new infection events compared with placebo and iNO (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.88 and OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.58; SUCRA: 91.8%). Conclusions: This NMA suggested that corticosteroids are possibly beneficial in the patients with ARDS while application of NMBAs may reduce 28-day mortality, iNO as a therapeutic measure which did not show a prominent beneficial effect. Study registration:PROSPERO, CRD42022333165

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference62 articles.

1. Villar J, Blanco J, Añón JM et al. The ALIEN study: incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilation [published correction appears in Intensive Care Med. 2011 Dec;37(12):1942]. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(12):1932–1941.

2. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T et al. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries [published correction appears in JAMA. 2016 Jul 19;316(3):350] [published correction appears in JAMA. 2016 Jul 19;316(3):350]. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788–800.

3. Acute respiratory distress syndrome;Meyer NJ;Lancet,2021

4. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment;Fan E;JAMA,2018

5. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome;Thompson BT;N Engl J Med,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3