How Well Does the Oswestry Disability Index Perform Among Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Surgery? – An observational prospective cohort study

Author:

Koivunen Konsta1,Widbom-Kolhanen Sara2,Pernaa Katri1,Arokoski Jari3,Saltychev Mikhail1

Affiliation:

1. Turku University Hospital and University of Turku

2. Satasairaala Hospital

3. Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University

Abstract

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to explore the internal consistency and factor structure of the Oswestry Disability Index among patients undergoing spinal surgery. The sample consisted of 1,990 patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery at a university hospital between 2018 and 2021. Methods The patients responded to the Oswestry Disability Index within 2 months before surgery. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal consistency. The factor structure was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Results The internal consistency of the Oswestry Disability Index was found to be good, with an alpha of 0.86. An exploratory factor analysis revealed unidimensionality. Confirmatory factor analysis showed at least moderate correlations between the main factor “disability” and all the individual items. The highest correlations were found for items “traveling,” “social life,” “sex life” and “personal care.” Discussion The result of this study was in line with other research that have reported a good internal consistency of the Oswestry Disability Index. The result of this study contradicts the previous research that have found a multiple-factor structure of the Oswestry Disability Index. The study was conducted in a single, highly specialized university clinic; therefore, the results might differ in primary care. Conclusions The Oswestry Disability Index is a unidimensional and internally consistent scale that can be used to assess the severity of disability in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. In the studied population, “traveling,” “social life,” “sex life” and “personal care” were the most important items to define the severity of disability, while “walking” and “standing” were the least important items. Trial registration Not applicable

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3