Efficacy of extended view totally extra peritoneal approach versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal on lay mesh plus for abdominal wall hernias: a single center preliminary study

Author:

Xu Haisong1,Huang Wenhao1,Guo Yuehua2,Li Mingyue2,Peng Gongze2,Wu Tianchong2

Affiliation:

1. Jinan University

2. Shenzhen People’s Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background Minimally invasive surgery through Laparoscopy had been the first treatment option for ventral hernias. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal on lay mesh (IPOM) plus approach for abdominal wall hernias is the classic procedure, while extended view totally extraperitoneal (e‑TEP) repair is a newer option. This study aimed to compare the preliminary effects of the two surgical procedures for abdominal wall hernias repair. Methods This is a retrospective and comparative single-center study done at The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University Hospital (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China, from January 2022 to December 2022. The study included all patients who had undergone abdominal wall hernia operation with a 2 to 6-cm defect size. Patients' baseline characteristics, hernia features, operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain level, and total hospitalization expenses were conducted systematically. Results We evaluated 53 cases, 22 in the e-TEP group and 31 in IPOM plus group. The demographic characteristics had no significant difference between the two groups. The time of surgery in e-TEP was significantly longer than IPOM plus (98.5 ± 10.7min vs. 65.9 ± 7.3min, P < 0.01). Postoperative pain levels (VAS) (4.2 ± 0.9 vs. 6.7 ± 0.9, P < 0.01), analgesic requirements (25.0 ± 37.0mg vs. 72.6 ± 40.5mg, P < 0.01), hospital stays (1.2 ± 0.5days vs. 2.2 ± 0.6days, P < 0.01), and total hospitalization expenses (19695.9 ± 1221.7CNY vs. 35286.2 ± 1196.6CNY, P < 0.01) by contrast were significantly lower for the e-TEP group. There was no difference in the mean intraoperative bleeding between the two groups and no postoperative complications during the observation period in the two groups. Conclusion As a new surgical technique for abdominal wall hernias repair, e-TEP appears to be better than IPOM plus in postoperative pain levels (VAS), analgesic requirements, hospital stays and hospitalization costs.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference35 articles.

1. Abdominal Wall Hernia;Reza Zahiri H;Curr Probl Surg,2018

2. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research;Poulose BK;Hernia,2012

3. Current national practice patterns for inpatient management of ventral abdominal wall hernia in the United States;Funk LM;Surg Endosc,2013

4. Minimally Invasive Surgery: Is Less More?;Azar FM;Orthop Clin North Am,2020

5. Shakil A, Aparicio K, Barta E. physician KMJAf: Inguinal Hernias: Diagnosis and Management. 2020, 102(8):487–492.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3