Mentalization-Based Treatment for a broad range of personality disorders: a naturalistic study

Author:

Rizzi Endang1,Weijers Jonas Gijs1,Kate Coriene ten1,Selten Jean-Paul2

Affiliation:

1. Rivierduinen Institute for Mental Health Care

2. Maastricht University

Abstract

Abstract Background: Several studies have observed that mentalization-based treatment (MBT) is an effective treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD), but its effectiveness for other personality disorders (PDs) has hardly been examined. Additionally, the evidence supporting the claim that MBT improves mentalizing capacity is scarce. The present study examined whether (i) patients with a broad range of PDs would profit from MBT (ii) mentalizing capacity would improve over time; (iii) patients with BPD would profit more from MBT than those with non-borderline PDs Method: Personality disorders, psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, maladaptive personality functioning and mentalizing capacity were measured in a group of individuals with various PDs (n = 46) that received MBT. Assessments were made at baseline and after 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment. The severity of psychiatric symptoms, measured using the Outcome Questionnaire 45, was the primary outcome variable. Results: Overall, enrollment in the MBT program was associated with a decrease in psychiatric symptoms and an improvement of personality functioning, social functioning for a mixed group of PDs (all p’s ≤ .01). Bigger effect sized were observed for BPD patients (n=25) than for patients with non-BPD (n=21), but the difference failed to reach statistical significance (p=0.06). A primary analysis showed that the decrease in psychiatric symptoms was significant in BPD patients (p=0.01), not in non-BPD (p=0.19) patients. However, a sufficiently powered secondary analysis with imputed data showed that non-BPD patients reported a significant decrease in psychiatric symptoms too (p=0.01). Mentalizing capacity of the whole group improved over time (dvaried between .68 and 1.46). Discussion: These results suggest that MBT is effective for a broad range of PDs and shows that MBT is associated with improvements in mentalizing capacity. As the study is not experimental in design, we cannot make causal claims. Trial Registration: The study design was approved by the Leiden University Ethical Committee. Conclusion: Mentalization-based treatment seems to be an effective treatment for patients with a broad range of PDs.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference73 articles.

1. Translation, Validation and Norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations;Aaronson NK;Elsevier Sci,1998

2. Attachment Studies with Borderline Patients: A Review;Agrawal HR;Harv Rev Psychiatry,2004

3. Allen JG, Fonagy P, Bateman AW. Mentaliseren in de klinische praktijk. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds; 2008.

4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Author, Washington, DC; 2000.

5. The twenty-item Toronto Alexitymia scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the facture structure;Bagby RM;J Psychosom Res,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3