Anticancer drugs versus supportive care for advanced esophageal cancer: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials and meta-analysis

Author:

Santero Marilina1,Meade Adriana2,Selva Anna3,Savall Olga2,Bracchiglione Javier4,Macías Ismael5,Leache Leire6,Cerdà Paula7,Cosp Xavier Bonfill2

Affiliation:

1. Universitat Autònoma Barcelona

2. Cochrane Iberoamérica

3. Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari. Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT_CERCA)

4. CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)

5. Hospital de Sabadell-Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí

6. Navarre Health Service

7. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Abstract

Abstract Background Esophageal cancer (EC) is a global health concern and a leading cause of death. A large number of patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage EC, with very poor survival rates Anticancer drugs have limited effectiveness and severe side effects, but new therapies like immunotherapy show potential despite associated adverse events. This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of anticancer drugs versus supportive care for advanced esophageal cancer (EC).Methods We searched (May 2022) MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Epistemonikos, and trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and PROSPERO) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anticancer drugs (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or biological/targeted therapy) with supportive care in advanced EC. The results were summarized using GRADE summary of finding tables.Results We included 15 RCTs. Most studies did not have a special focus on EC, did not detail the treatment lines in all patients, and did not evaluate all outcomes. Anticancer drugs may result in a slight increase in overall survival (OS) (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.71, 0.86; MD 0.83 months) and better progression free survival (PFS) (HR 0.56 95% CI 0.49, 0.64, MD 0.68 months), but also may increase toxicity (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.13, 1.65), without a significant improvement in quality of life. The certainty of evidence was low or very low due to indirectness of results and lack of specific focus on EC in some studies.Conclusion RCTs on advanced EC lack specificity, detailed treatment line information, and evaluation of all relevant outcomes. Moreover, when they find any benefit, this is negligible. Therefore, the certainty to justify anticancer drug treatments instead of BSC in advanced EC is low or very low and it is essential to weigh the potential benefits and risks carefully with active involvement of patients.Registration: The study protocol was registered in OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7CHX6) on 2022-03-29.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3