Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Au-Pt Alloy Nanowires:
Effects of Strain Rate, Temperature, and Composition
Author:
Guha Souvik1ORCID, Guha Sirshendu2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur-721302, India 2. Engineers India Limited, New Delhi-110066, India
Abstract
Abstract
The mechanical properties exhibited by nanostructures of a metal alloy are significantly different from those exhibited by the same alloy in the bulk state. Molecular dynamics is a powerful simulation method to analyze the properties of metal alloy nanostructures. In this work, yield stress, elastic modulus, and modulus of resilience of Au-Pt alloy nanowires are studied using molecular dynamics, and how the temperature, the alloy composition, and the strain rate at which the nanowires are subjected to tension affect these properties have been analyzed. Results demonstrate that yield stress, elastic modulus, yield strain, and resilience modulus, deteriorate with temperature irrespective of applied strain rates of 0.0002 ps-1 and 0.02 ps-1. At low strain rates, the deformation mechanism involves cyclical yielding and recrystallization, whereas higher strain rates cause amorphization of the crystal structure. Increased strain rate causes higher yield stress, higher modulus of resilience, and lower modulus of elasticity. It is found that alloy nanowires with higher Au concentrations generally show a reduction in all mechanical properties. We observed that Au75Pt25, and Au50Pt50 nanowires yield just after commencement of elongation at 600K. Simulation results indicate that the absolute value of the potential energy of pure Au after conjugate-gradient minimization and thermal equilibration at 300K is the lowest whereas the absolute value of the potential energy of pure Pt is the highest at the same conditions. The simulation also shows that as the percentage of Pt increases in Au-Pt alloys, the absolute value of potential energy increases at the same conditions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Adams, B., Bohnhoff, W., Dalbey, K., Ebeida, M., Eddy, J., Eldred, M., Hooper, R., Hough, P., Hu, K., Jakeman, J., Khalil, M., Maupin, K., Monschke, J., Ridgway, E., Rushdi, A., Seidl, D., Stephens, J., & Winokur, J. (2020, November 1). Dakota, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis: Version 6.13 User’s Manual. https://doi.org/10.2172/1817318 2. Alder, B. J., & Wainwright, T. E. (1957, November 1). Phase Transition for a Hard Sphere System. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 27(5), 1208–1209. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1743957 3. Becker, C. A., Tavazza, F., Trautt, Z. T., & Buarque de Macedo, R. A. (2013, December). Considerations for choosing and using force fields and interatomic potentials in materials science and engineering. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, 17(6), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2013.10.001 4. Bescond, M., Cavassilas, N., & Lannoo, M. (2007, May 29). Effective-mass approach for n-type semiconductor nanowire MOSFETs arbitrarily oriented. Nanotechnology, 18(25), 255201. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/25/255201 5. Callister, W. D., & Rethwisch, D. G. (2012, January 1). Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering. John Wiley & Sons.
|
|