Naming racism as a root cause of inequities in palliative care research: A scoping review

Author:

Algu Kavita1,Wales Joshua1,Anderson Michael2,Omilabu Mariam1,Briggs Thandi3,Kurahashi Allison M.1

Affiliation:

1. Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care

2. Waakebiness-Bryce Institute for Indigenous Health, University of Toronto

3. Home and Community Care Support Services Toronto Central

Abstract

Abstract Background Research is a core component in palliative care development and racial and ethnic inequities in palliative care are well-established. Examining this topic in an evidence informed manner, including the recognition of established root causes such as systemic racism, will allow researchers to substantively inform meaningful actions and policy changes to ultimately decrease these differences. Objective To summarize how peer reviewed literature has investigated racial and ethnic differences in palliative care over the last 13 years, exploring to what extent established root causes such as systemic and interpersonal racism are considered when contextualizing findings. Methods We searched bibliographic databases for primary, peer reviewed studies globally, in all languages, that collected race or ethnicity variables in a palliative care context (January 1, 2011 to October 17, 2023). We recorded study characteristics and categorized citations based on their research intention (if race or ethnicity were named in the study purpose), and the interpretation of findings (i.e. if systemic or interpersonal factors, including racism, were discussed when contextualizing the study results). Results Of 181 included studies, most were from the United States (88.95%) and purposefully investigated race or ethnicity (71.27%). Systemic or interpersonal factors were more often alluded to (41.44%) than explicitly named (20.44%). Racism was specifically mentioned in 7.18% of publications. There appears to be a trend toward explicitly naming racism from 2021–2023, with 36% of studies published in 2023 using the key word racis*. Conclusion Researchers hold power in shaping the trajectory of health disparities research regarding racial and ethnic disparities in palliative care, and informing subsequent actions and policy changes aimed to reduce these inequities. It is imperative that researchers use thoughtful methods in their studies, including purposeful research framing, questions and analysis; and that researchers ground these components in an evidence-based understanding of the root causes that drive these inequities, including the explicit naming of systemic and interpersonal racism.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference208 articles.

1. Application of Critical Race Theory in Palliative Care Research: A Scoping Review;Marcewicz L;J Pain Symptom Manag,2022

2. Racial/ethnic disparities in nursing home end-of-life care: A systematic review;Estrada LV;J Am Med Dir Assoc,2021

3. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Palliative Care;Johnson KS;J Palliat Med,2013

4. Rosa WE, Gray TF, Chambers B, Sinclair S, Knaul FM, Bhadelia A, et al. Palliative care in the face of racism: A call to transform clinical practice, research, policy, and leadership. Health Affairs Forefront; 2022.

5. World Health Organization. Strengthening primary health care to tackle racial discrimination, promote intercultural services and reduce health inequities Research Brief2022 https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/363854/9789240057104-eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 9 Dec 2023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3