Nurses’ work in relation to patient health outcomes: an observational study comparing models of primary care

Author:

Sheridan Nicolette1,Hoare Karen1,Carryer Jenny1,Mills Jane2,Hewitt Sarah1,Love Tom3,Kenealy Timothy4,Aguirre-Duarte Nelson4,Arroll Bruce4,Atmore Carol5,Crampton Peter5,Dowell Anthony5,Fishman Tana6,Gauld Robin5,Harwood Matire4,Jackson Gary7,Jansen Rawiri McKree8,Kerse Ngaire4,Lampshire Debra4,McBain Lynn5,MacRae Jayden9,Øvretveit John10,Percival Teuila11,Perera Roshan1,Roland Martin12,Ryan Debbie13,Schmidt-Busby Jacqueline14,Stokes Tim5,Stubbe Maria5,Watt Daniel3,Peck Chris3

Affiliation:

1. Massey University, Aotearoa New Zealand

2. La Trobe University

3. Sapere Research Group

4. University of Auckland

5. University of Otago

6. Alliance Health Plus

7. Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau

8. National Hauora Coalition

9. Datacraft Analytics

10. Karolinska Institute

11. Moana Research

12. University of Cambridge

13. Pacific Perspectives

14. Comprehensive Care PHO

Abstract

Abstract Background Māori are over-represented in Aotearoa New Zealand morbidity and mortality statistics. Other populations with high health needs include Pacific peoples and those living with material deprivation. General practice has evolved into different models of primary care. We describe nurse work in relation to these models of care; populations with high health need; and patient health outcomes. Methods Cross-sectional study (30 September 2018), data from national datasets and practices at patient level. Six primary outcome measures were selected because they could be improved by primary care: polypharmacy (≥65 years), HbA1c testing in adults with diabetes, immunisations (6 months), ambulatory sensitive hospitalisations (0-14, 45-64 years) and emergency department attendances. Analysis adjusted for patient and practice characteristics. Results Nurse FTE, and combined nurse, nurse practitioner and general practitioner FTE, were substantially higher in Trust/NGO, Māori, and Pacific practices than Traditional, Corporate, or Health Care Home practices. A progressive increase of clinically complex patients was associated with more clinical input and higher scores on all outcome measures. The highest rates of nurse consultations afterhours and with unenrolled patients, improving access, were in PHO/DHB, Pacific, Trust/NGO and Māori practices. Compared to general practitioners, nurses undertook more cardiovascular risk assessment in all models of care except PHO/DHB, and more cervical screening in Pacific, Trust/NGO and Māori practices. The highest rates of preventative care by nurses (cervical screening, cardiovascular risk assessment, PHQ9 assessment, HbA1c testing) were in Māori, Trust/NGO and Pacific practices. There was an 8-fold difference, across models of care, in percentage of PHQ9 undertaken by nurses and a 5-fold difference in cervical screening and HbA1c testing. Work not attributed to nurses in the practice records meant nurse work was underestimated to an unknown degree. Conclusions Transferring work to nurses in Traditional, Health Care Home, and Corporate practices, would release GP FTE to be utilised for other work. Worse patient health outcomes were associated with higher patient need and higher clinical input. It is plausible that there is insufficient clinical input to meet the degree of patient need. More practitioner FTE is required, especially in practices with high volumes of complex patients.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference25 articles.

1. Structural reform or a cultural reform? Moving the health and disability sector to be pro-equity, culturally safe, Tiriti compliant and anti-racist;Reid P;N Z Med J,2021

2. Smith LT. Decolonizing Methodologies. Research and Indigenous Peoples 2edn. London: Zed Books; 2012.

3. Ramsden IM: Cultural Safety and Nursing Education in Aotearoa and Te Waipounamu. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Victoria University of Wellington, 2002.

4. Durie M. Whaiora. Māori health and development. 2 ed. Auckland: Oxford University Press; 2007.

5. Painting a new picture for practice nurses in a capitated environment: who holds the brush?;Docherty B;New Zealand Medical Journal,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3