Learning effects in visual grading assessment of new reconstruction algorithms in abdominal Computed Tomography

Author:

Kataria Bharti1,Sandborg Michael2,Öman Jenny1,Smedby Örjan3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health, Medicine & Caring Sciences, Linköping University

2. Department of Medical Physics, Linköping University

3. KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Abstract

Abstract ObjectivesImages reconstructed with higher strengths of iterative reconstruction algorithms impair radiologists’ subjective perception and diagnostic performance due to changes in the amplitude of different spatial frequencies of noise. The hypothesis was that there was a change in radiologists´ assessments towards a more positive attitude to the higher strengths of Advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm (ADMIRE). Can radiologists learn to adapt to the unusual appearance of images produced by higher strengths of ADMIRE?MethodsThe present study is based on two ethical board, previously published, studies that evaluated the performance of ADMIRE in non-contrast and contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. Images from 25 (first material) and 50 (second material) clinical examinations, were reconstructed with ADMIRE strengths 3, 5 and filtered back projection (FBP). These images were assessed by local radiologists using image criteria obtained from the European guidelines for quality criteria in CT. To ascertain if there was a learning effect as the reviews progressed, results from these two studies were used in the new analyses of existing data by introducing a time variable in the mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression model.ResultsFor the highest strength (5) of the ADMIRE algorithm, the significant negative attitude for both liver parenchyma and overall image quality for diagnostic purposes, at the beginning of the reviews was strengthened during the progress of the reviews in both materials. For ADMIRE strength 3, an early positive attitude for the algorithm was perceived with no significant change over time for majority of the criteria except for one criterion, i.e., the overall image quality, where a significant negative trend over time was seen in the second material. ConclusionsAs the reviews in both materials progressed, an increasing dislike for ADMIRE 5 images was apparent for at least two image criteria. In the time perspective of weeks or months, no learning effect towards accepting the new algorithm could be demonstrated.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference24 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3