Affiliation:
1. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
Abstract
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to compare the effects of different framework production techniques used in porcelain-fused-to-titanium restorations on color changes.Methods Forty-five square specimens were produced using cast, milling, and laser-sintering techniques. Opaque and dentin porcelain were implemented, and all frameworks glazed. Color measurements were made with a spectrophotometer at before and after opaque application and after porcelain + glaze application, and L*, a*, b* values were obtained. Color difference analyses (ΔE00) were made using the CIEDE2000 formula. Shapiro Wilks (Normality) and ANOVA (Post Hoc:Bonferroni) tests were used to analyze the data (p < 0.05).Results At the different laboratory steps, the difference between cast&laser-sintered groups and between milled&laser-sintered groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Before and after opaque application, the differences in L*, a*, and b* values between cast, milled and laser-sintered groups were found a statistically significant (p < 0.05).Conclusions The color of porcelain-fused-to-titanium restorations was influenced by different framework production techniques.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches;Douglas RD;J Prosthet Dent,1999
2. Ceramic pressed to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal: a comperative study of bond strength;Venkatachalam B;Int J Prosthodont,2009
3. All-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures: a comparative study by 2D finite element analyses;Motta AB;J Appl Oral Sci,2007
4. Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 11th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2003. pp. 621–54.
5. Comparison of the bond compatibility of titanium and an NiCr alloy to dental porcelain;Yilmaz H;J Dent,1999