Affiliation:
1. Aarhus Universitetshospital
2. Oslo University Hospital: Oslo Universitetssykehus
3. Rigshospitalet Center for Hjerte Kar Lunge og Infektionssygdomme
4. Uppsala University Hospital: Akademiska sjukhuset
5. Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Health Care and Social Services: Metropolia ammattikorkeakoulu Hyvinvointi
6. Landspítali University Hospital: Landspitali
7. Aarhus University Hospital: Aarhus Universitetshospital
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Contemporary management of uncomplicated type B aortic dissections (uTBAD) is based on the acuity and various morphological features. Medical therapy is mandatory, while the risks of early thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are balanced against the potential for rupture, complex surgery, and death. Improved aortic morphology following TEVAR is documented, but evidence for improved overall survival is lacking. The costs and impact on quality-of-life are also needed.
Methods: The trial is a randomized, open label, superiority clinical trial with parallel assignment of subjects at 23 clinical sites in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Iceland. Eligibility includes patients aged ≥ 18 with uTBAD of < 4 weeks duration. Recruited subjects will be randomized to either standard medical therapy (SMT) or SMT+TEVAR, where TEVAR must be performed between 2-12 weeks from the onset of symtpoms.
Discussion: This trial will evaluate the primary question of whether early TEVAR improves survival at 5 years among uTBAD patients. Moreover, the costs and the impact on quality-of-life should provide sorely needed data on other factors that play a role in treatment strategy decisions. The common Nordic healthcare model, with inclusion of all aortic centers, provides a favorable setting for carrying out this trial, while the robust healthcare registries ensure data validity.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05215587, posted January 31, 2022
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Acute Aortic Dissection: Population-Based Incidence Compared With Degenerative Aortic Aneurysm Rupture;Clouse WD;Mayo Clin Proc,2004
2. Writing Committee, Riambau V, Böckler D, Brunkwall J, Cao P, Chiesa R, et al. editors. ’s Choice – Management of Descending Thoracic Aorta Diseases: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2017;53:4–52. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.06.005.
3. Population-based study of incidence and outcome of acute aortic dissection and premorbid risk factor control: 10-year results from the oxford vascular study;Howard DPJ;Circulation,2013
4. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease;Hagan PG;JAMA,2000
5. Influence of clinical presentation on the outcome of acute B aortic dissection: evidences from IRAD;Trimarchi S;J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino),2012