Affiliation:
1. UCLA Department of Psychology
2. Yale University Department of Neurology
3. David Geffen School of Medicine: University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine
4. University of Liege: Universite de Liege
5. Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
6. Moss Rehabilitation Hospital
7. King's College London School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences
Abstract
Abstract
Background. Over the past thirty years, there have been significant advances in the understanding of the mechanisms associated with loss and recovery of consciousness following severe brain injury. This work has provided a strong grounding for the development of novel restorative therapeutic interventions. While all interventions are aimed at modulating, and thereby restoring, brain function, the landscape of existing interventions encompasses a very wide scope of techniques and protocols. Despite vigorous research efforts, few approaches have been assessed with rigorous, high-quality, randomized controlled trials. As a growing number of exploratory interventions emerge, it is paramount to develop standardized approaches to reporting results. The successful evaluation of novel interventions depends on implementation of shared nomenclature and infrastructure. To address this gap, the Neurocritical Care Society’s Curing Coma Campaign convened nine working groups and charged them with developing Common Data Elements (CDEs). Here, we report the work of the Therapeutic Interventions Working Group.
Methods. The Working Group reviewed existing CDEs relevant to therapeutic interventions within the NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) database and reviewed the literature for assessing key areas of research in the intervention space. CDEs were then proposed, iteratively discussed and reviewed, classified, and organized in a Case Report Form.
Results. We developed a unified CRF, including CDEs and key design elements (KDE; i.e., methodological or protocol parameters), divided into five sections: (i) patient information; (ii) general study information; (iii) behavioral interventions; (iv) pharmacological interventions; and (v) device interventions.
Conclusion. The newly created CRF enhances systematization of future work by proposing a portfolio of measures that should be collected in the development and implementation of studies assessing novel interventions intended to increase the level of consciousness or rate of recovery of consciousness in patients with DoC
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Mechanisms Underlying Disorders of Consciousness: Bridging Gaps to Move Toward an Integrated Translational Science;Luppi AI;Neurocrit Care,2021
2. Comprehensive Systematic Review Update Summary: Disorders of Consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research;Giacino JT;Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2018
3. Practice Guideline Update Recommendations Summary: Disorders of Consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research;Giacino JT;Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2018
4. European Academy of Neurology guideline on the diagnosis of coma and other disorders of consciousness;Kondziella D;Eur J Neurol,2020
5. Royal College of Physicians. Prolonged Disorders of consciousness following sudden onset brain injury: national clinical guidelines. London: RCP; 2020.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献