Common Data Element for Disorders of Consciousness: Recommendations from the Working Group on Therapeutic Interventions

Author:

Monti Martin M1ORCID,Beekman Rachel2,Spivak Norman M3,Thibaut Aurore4,Schnakers Caroline5,Whyte John6,Molteni Erika7

Affiliation:

1. UCLA Department of Psychology

2. Yale University Department of Neurology

3. David Geffen School of Medicine: University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine

4. University of Liege: Universite de Liege

5. Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

6. Moss Rehabilitation Hospital

7. King's College London School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background. Over the past thirty years, there have been significant advances in the understanding of the mechanisms associated with loss and recovery of consciousness following severe brain injury. This work has provided a strong grounding for the development of novel restorative therapeutic interventions. While all interventions are aimed at modulating, and thereby restoring, brain function, the landscape of existing interventions encompasses a very wide scope of techniques and protocols. Despite vigorous research efforts, few approaches have been assessed with rigorous, high-quality, randomized controlled trials. As a growing number of exploratory interventions emerge, it is paramount to develop standardized approaches to reporting results. The successful evaluation of novel interventions depends on implementation of shared nomenclature and infrastructure. To address this gap, the Neurocritical Care Society’s Curing Coma Campaign convened nine working groups and charged them with developing Common Data Elements (CDEs). Here, we report the work of the Therapeutic Interventions Working Group. Methods. The Working Group reviewed existing CDEs relevant to therapeutic interventions within the NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) database and reviewed the literature for assessing key areas of research in the intervention space. CDEs were then proposed, iteratively discussed and reviewed, classified, and organized in a Case Report Form. Results. We developed a unified CRF, including CDEs and key design elements (KDE; i.e., methodological or protocol parameters), divided into five sections: (i) patient information; (ii) general study information; (iii) behavioral interventions; (iv) pharmacological interventions; and (v) device interventions. Conclusion. The newly created CRF enhances systematization of future work by proposing a portfolio of measures that should be collected in the development and implementation of studies assessing novel interventions intended to increase the level of consciousness or rate of recovery of consciousness in patients with DoC

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3