Best Practices and Training Needs Related to Interactions With Family Members During Neonatal Resuscitation Procedures: A Scoping Review Protocol

Author:

HERVIEUX Coralie1,MOUSSA Ahmed2,LOYE Nathalie1,BOURQUE Claude Julie1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Université de Montréal

2. CHU Sainte-Justine

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Family presence during a resuscitation (FPDR) in neonatology is unevenly accepted by healthcare professionals (HCPs). To develop innovative educational materials for resuscitation teams in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), evidence-based information is needed on constructive interactions with family members during the procedures. This protocol is for a scoping review that aims to identify the best practices regarding support and interactions of HCPs with family members during neonatal resuscitation in the NICU and to propose recommendations for developing a targeted in-situ simulation training. The review willfocus on HCPs’ perception of FPDR in terms of interpersonal skills, reluctance and need for interactional training. Methods and analysis: In 2021, Dainty and collaborators published a systematic review on FPDR (pediatric and neonatal) that focused on the impact on the patients as well as family-centered and HCP centred outcomes. From their literature strategic search, we will extrapolate and narrow down the search to “neonatology” and add relevant recent studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) model will guide the literature search on four electronic databases (ScienceDirect, PubMed, MEDLINE Ovid and CINAHL) for studies published from January 2012 to December 2022. Data collection process will be documented through a PRISMA-P flowchart, including the application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. After data extraction, we will conduct a descriptive thematic analysis to synthesise content and identify emerging themes on family support and interactions, and on behaviors and actions recommended for HCP during neonatal resuscitation. Ethics and dissemination: Formal ethic approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. The findings of this study will be disseminated through scientific conferences, publications, and knowledge transfer activities in simulation training in neonatology.

Funder

Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3