Clinical and Imaging Findings for the Evaluation of Large Rathke’s Cleft Cysts and Cystic Craniopharyngiomas

Author:

Yang Chung-Han1,Wu Chia-Hung1,Lin Te-Ming1,Chen Shu-Ting1,Tai Wei-An1,Yu Kai-Wei1,Luo Chao-Bao1,Lirng Jiing-Feng1,Chang Feng-Chi1

Affiliation:

1. Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Large Rathke’s cleft cysts (LRCCs) and cystic craniopharyngiomas (CCPs) arise from the same embryological origin and may have similar MR presentations. However, the two tumors have different management strategies and outcomes. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical and imaging findings of LRCCs and CCPs, aiming to evaluate their pretreatment diagnosis and outcomes. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 20 patients with LRCCs and 25 patients with CCPs. Both tumors had a maximal diameter of more than 20 mm. We evaluated the patients’ clinical and MR imaging findings, including symptoms, management strategies, outcomes, anatomic growth patterns and signal changes. Results The age of onset for LRCCs versus CCPs was 49.0 ± 16.8 versus 34.2 ± 22.2 years (p = .022); the following outcomes were observed for LRCCs versus CCPs: 1) postoperative diabetes insipidus: 6/20 (30%) versus 17/25 (68%) (p = .006); and 2) posttreatment recurrence: 2/20 (10%) versus 10/25 (40%) (p = .025). The following MR findings were observed for LRCCs versus CCPs: 1) solid component: 7/20 (35%) versus 21/25 (84%) (p = .001); 2) thick cyst wall: 2/20 (10%) versus 12/25 (48%) (p = .009); 3) intracystic septation: 1/20 (5%) versus 8/25 (32%) (p = .030); 4) snowman shape: 18/20 (90%) versus 1/25 (4%) (p < .001); 5) off-midline extension: 0/0 (0%) versus 10/25 (40%) (p = .001); and 6) oblique angle of the sagittal long axis of the tumor: 89.9° versus 107.1° (p = .001). Conclusions LRCCs can be differentiated from CCPs based on their clinical and imaging findings, especially their specific anatomical growth patterns. We suggest using the pretreatment diagnosis to select the appropriate surgical approach and thus improve the clinical outcome.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3