Affiliation:
1. NHS Fife
2. Simon Fraser University
3. University of Dundee
Abstract
Abstract
Background Advance care planning (ACP) is a priority topic within palliative care service provisions. Many healthcare professionals have a duty of care to engage patients in ACP discussions as early as possible. Family members of palliative patients are arguably best placed to encourage discussions of ACP, although often find this difficult. Therefore, community nurses immediately caring for these patients can encourage these discussions, utilising the built rapport and relationships they have with both patients and families. Despite this potential, nurses appear conflicted towards ACP discussions because of several barriers (e.g., education, time) or facilitators (e.g., relationships, patient readiness). This review was undertaken to explore these factors which influence how nurses apply ACP in the context of caring for their patients.Method To explore the perspectives of community nurses with ACP application, a scoping review was undertaken in June 2021 and the resultant database of 15 articles were thematically analysed to answer a research question: ‘What factors contribute to or hinder ACP discussion for community nurses, when providing care to palliative patients?’.Results Several ACP barriers and facilitators were identified from a nursing standpoint. Key barriers were – lack of confidence, competence, role, and prognostic uncertainty. Key facilitators identified the pertinence of the patient-practitioner relationship enabling ACP amongst nurses who had both competence and experience in ACP and/or palliative care.Conclusions This review suggests that community nurses’ perceived experience and competence is associated with implementing ACP effectively with palliative patients. Furthermore, it identified that future research is needed to develop interventions to promote ACP uptake in community settings, enabling confidence building and higher standards of palliative care via the implementation of ACPs.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference89 articles.
1. AarslandD,CreeseB,PolitisM,ChaudhuriKR,FfytcheDH,WeintraubD,BallardC.Cognitive decline in Parkinson disease.Nature Reviews Neurology.2017;13;217–231.
2. AGE UK.Advance Decisions,AdvanceStatementsandLivingWills.2021.https://www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/factsheets/fs72_advance_decisions_advance_statements_and_living_wills_fcs.pdfAccessed21.07.2021.
3. AikenLH,SermeusW,Van denHeedeK,SloaneDM,BusseR,McKeeM,BruyneelL,RaffertyAM,GriffithsP,Moreno-CasbasMT,TishelmanC,ScottA,BrzostekT,KinnunenJ,SchwendimannR,HeinenM,ZikosD,SjetneIS,SmithHL.andKutney-LeeA.Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: Cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States.BMJ.2012;doi:10.1136/bmj.e1717.
4. Patient experience of primary care and advance care planning: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan;Aoki T;Fam Pract,2017
5. ArkseyH,O’MalleyL.Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework.International Journal of Social research Methodology.2005;8:1:19–32.