Does benefits-of-breastfeeding language or risks-of-formula-feeding language promote more-positive attitudes toward breastfeeding among nurses?

Author:

Toda Ayumi1,Nanishi Keiko2,Shibanuma Akira2

Affiliation:

1. Tokyo Medical and Dental University

2. University of Tokyo

Abstract

Abstract Background. Nurses are crucial in helping new mothers to learn the necessary skills and overcome the difficulties of breastfeeding. Few studies have explored appropriate language for nursing education on breastfeeding. We assessed the impact of the language used on breastfeeding attitudes among Japanese nurses. Methods. A quasi-experimental study was conducted online in Japan among 174 nurses who had work experience in obstetrics or pediatrics. Participants were allocated to three groups to receive different text messages as the intervention (the benefit of breastfeeding for Group 1; the risk of formula feeding for Group 2; the importance of childcare for Group 3 as the comparison). The Japanese version of the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS-J) was used to assess breastfeeding attitudes before and after reading the texts. Also, participant reactions to the text were assessed by their responses to three statements. ANOVA, the chi-square test, and the t-test were used for outcome assessments. Results. The post-test IIFAS-J score was significantly higher than the pre-test score only for Group 1 (p < 0.01). The percentage of nurses who agreed with the content of the text was 70.7% in Group 1 and 48.3% in Group 2. The percentage of nurses who reported discomfort with the text was 34.5% in Group 1 and 55.2% in Group 2. No significant difference among groups existed regarding interest in the text. In all three groups, participants who agreed with the text had higher post-test IIFAS-J score than those who disagreed with the text (6.85 points higher, p < 0.01 in Group 1; 7.19 points higher, p < 0.01 in Group 2; 8.00 points higher, p < 0.02 in Group 3). Discomfort with the text and interest in the text were associated with higher post-test IIFAS-J score in Group 1 and Group 2 but not significantly associated in Group 3. Conclusions. “Benefits of breastfeeding” language is suggested to be better than “risks of infant formula” language for producing a positive attitude to breastfeeding in nursing education. Trial registration. This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000023322). Registered 05/08/2016.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Nurses and midwives professional support increases with improved attitudes - design and effects of a longitudinal randomized controlled process-oriented intervention;Ekström AC;BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2015

2. A systematic review of professional support interventions for breastfeeding;Hannula L;J Clin Nurs,2008

3. First time mothers' views of breastfeeding support from nurses;Hong TM;MCN The American journal of maternal child nursing,2003

4. Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations related to implementing the Baby-Friendly Initiative (BFI): an integrative review;Semenic S;J Hum lactation,2012

5. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies;McFadden A;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3