Needs assessment of informal caregivers supporting a person with dementia: a descriptive study of current practices

Author:

Pasquier Noémie1,Pihet Sandrine1,Carrard Isabelle2

Affiliation:

1. HES-SO: University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg School of Health Sciences

2. HES-SO: University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva School of Health Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background Informal caregivers who support a person with dementia (ICDs) play an essential role in the healthcare system. Their intensive contribution puts them at high risk of negative consequences on their physical and psychological health. Despite significant unmet needs, ICDs rarely or only belatedly ask for support. Identifying these unmet needs is essential for a timely use of the relevant support services and for the prevention of exhaustion. Research about how diverse support providers assess the needs of ICDs is scarce. Our study aimed to describe current evaluation practices of support providers regarding needs assessment in one Swiss canton (province), in order to identify strengths and weaknesses. Methods A survey was completed by 55 professionals and volunteers involved in ICDs support with six open-ended and four closed questions investigating current practices for assessing the needs of ICDs. Results A diversity of providers assessing the needs of ICDs reported spending on average 45 minutes per assessment (range: 5-120 minutes). Most providers declared that they were reassessing the needs of ICDs (80%) and in most cases ICDs received some feedback after the assessment (86.5%). Few providers used a systematic procedure focused on ICDs (27.1%), and no validated tool with a focus on the needs of ICDs was used. Only 52.7% of providers reported having been trained in needs assessment. 41.8% described heterogeneous assessment procedures in their service, and the collected information was mostly stored in files related to the person with dementia (PwD) and not in a file directly attributed to the ICD. Conclusion Current practices in assessment of the needs of ICDs maintain the lack of coordination within the fragmented network of support providers, highlighting the need for policy thinking along the ICDs trajectory. As a first step towards improvement, providers need a cross-professional tool that allows for systematic and exhaustive assessment focused on the needs of ICDs.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference42 articles.

1. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019;Collaborators GBDDF;Lancet Public Health,2022

2. Global estimates of informal care;Wimo A,2018

3. Dementia statistics https://www.alzint.org/about/dementia-facts-figures/dementia-statistics/.

4. Association Alzheimer Suisse. Les démences en Suisse 2020 - Faits et chiffres. In.; 2020.

5. BASS. Coûts de la démence en Suisse. In.; 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3