The clinical trials activation process: a case study of an Italian Public Hospital

Author:

Pelazza Carolina1ORCID,Betti Marta1,Marengo Francesca1,Roveta Annalisa1,Maconi Antonio1

Affiliation:

1. Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Alessandria

Abstract

Abstract Background/aims In order to make the centers more attractive to trial sponsors, in recent years some research institutions around the world have pursued projects to reorganize the pathway of trial activation, developing new organizational models to improve the activation process and reduce its times. This study aims at analyzing and reorganizing the start-up phase of trials conducted at the Research and Innovation Department (DAIRI) of the Public Hospital of Alessandria (Italy). Methods A project was carried out to reorganize the trial authorization process at DAIRI by involving the three facilities responsible for this pathway: Clinical Trial Center (CTC), Ethics Committee Secretariat (ESC) and Administrative Coordination (AC). Lean Thinking methodology was used with the A3 report tool and the analysis was carried out by monitoring specific key performance indicators, derived from variables representing highlights of the trials' activation pathway. The project involved phases of analysis, implementation of identified countermeasures and monitoring of timelines in 8 four-month periods. The overall mean and median values of studies activation times were calculated, as well as the average times for each facility involved in the process. Results In this study, 298 studies both sponsored by research associations and industry with both observational and interventional study design were monitored. The mean trial activation time was reduced from 218 days before the project to 56 days in the last period monitored. From the first to the last monitoring period, each facility involved achieved at least a halving of the average time required to carry out its activities in the clinical trials activation pathway (CTC: 55 days vs 23, ECS: 25 days vs 8, AC 29 days vs 10). Average activation time for studies with agreement remains longer than those without agreement (100 days vs. 46). Conclusions The reorganization project emphasized the importance of having clinical and administrative staff specifically trained on the trial activation process. This reorganization led to the development of a standard operating procedure and a tool to monitor the time (KPIs of the process) that can also be implemented in other clinical centers.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference15 articles.

1. Towards a More Competitive Italy in Clinical Research: The Survey of Attitudes towards Trial sites in Europe (The SAT-EU StudyTM);Gehring M;Epidemiol Biostatistics Public Health,2015

2. Indagine sul processo di valutazione degli studi clinici e relative tempistiche autorizzative in alcuni Paesi europei;Colcera S;Tendenze nuove,2016

3. Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2.). https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-e-6-r2-guideline-good-clinical-practice-step-5_en.pdf.

4. Protocol Development Program: A Novel Approach to Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Research;Miller T;Monit (Assoc Clin Pharmacol),2013

5. What are the main inefficiencies in trial conduct: a survey of UKCRC registered clinical trials units in the UK;Duley L;Trials,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3