Transperineal ultrasound measurement of the levator plate angle and anorectal angle is a useful method for evaluating uterine prolapse : a prospective cohort study

Author:

Dai Jiangfeng1,Liu Shunlan1,Li Jiawen1,Zhang Shijie1,Xu Wu2,Lyu Guorong1,He Shaozheng1

Affiliation:

1. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University

2. Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital

Abstract

Abstract

Background Confirming the patient's cervical position using transperineal ultrasound is not an easy task. This study aimed to employ transperineal ultrasound to measure the levator plate angle (LPA) and anorectal angle (ARA) in patients with varying degrees of uterine prolapse and to explore their efficacy in assessing uterine prolapse. Methods This prospective study consecutively enrolled 130 female patients who underwent examinations for lower urinary tract or pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from August 2022 to December 2023. Participants were divided into three groups based on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system: POP-Q = 0 (n = 45), POP-Q = 1 (n = 45), and POP-Q ≥ 2 (n = 40). Transperineal ultrasound was used to measure the LPA and ARA at rest (rLPA and rARA) and during maximum Valsalva maneuver (vLPA and vARA). Changes in LPA and ARA from rest to maximal Valsalva (ΔLPA and ΔARA) were calculated. The differences in these ultrasound parameters among the three groups were compared. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the diagnostic performance. Results With increasing severity of uterine prolapse, vLPA decreased progressively, while vARA and ΔARA initially decreased and then increased (P < 0.05). Compared with the POP-Q stage = 0 group, rLPA was reduced in the POP-Q stage ≥ 2 group, and ΔLPA was reduced in the POP-Q stage = 1 and POP-Q stage ≥ 2 groups (P < 0.05). The optimal cutoff values for diagnosing POP-Q stage ≥ 1 were 27.01° for rLPA, -2.29° for vLPA, and − 26.11° for ΔLPA, with corresponding AUCs of 0.65, 0.86, and 0.75. For diagnosing POP-Q stage ≥ 2, the optimal cutoff values were 24.11° for rLPA, -6.97° for vLPA, and − 34.57° for ΔLPA, with corresponding AUCs of 0.67, 0.80, and 0.69. DeLong's test indicated that vLPA had the highest efficacy in diagnosing both POP-Q stage ≥ 1 and POP-Q stage ≥ 2 (P < 0.05). Conclusion Transperineal ultrasound measurement of the LPA and ARA is a simple and effective method for assessing uterine prolapse.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Raju R, Linder BJ. Evaluation and Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2021;96(12):3122-9.

2. Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: a review;Shek KL;Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2016

3. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system?;Madhu C;Neurourol Urodyn,2018

4. Ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse;Dietz HP;Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2019

5. Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse;Dietz HP;Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3