Perceptions and practices surrounding the perioperative management of frail emergency surgery patients: a WSES endorsed cross-sectional qualitative survey

Author:

Viswanath Mallaika1,Clinch Darja2,Ceresoli Marco3,Dhesi Jugdeep4,D'oria Mario5,De Simone Belinda6,Podda Mauro7,Saverio Salomone Di8,Coccolini Federico9,Sartelli Massimo10,Catena Fausto11,Moore Ernest12,Rangar Deepa2,Biffl Walter L.13,Damaskos Dimitrios2

Affiliation:

1. University of Edinburgh

2. Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

3. University of Milano-Bicocca

4. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

5. University Hospital of Trieste

6. Poissy and Saint Germain en Laye Hospitals

7. University of Cagliari

8. Hospital of San Benedetto del Tronto

9. Pisa University Hospital Pisa

10. Macerata Hospital

11. Bufalini Hospital

12. Denver Health System - Denver Health Medical Center

13. Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla

Abstract

Abstract Background Frailty is associated with poor post-operative outcomes in emergency surgical patients. Shared multidisciplinary models have been developed to provide a holistic, reactive model of care to improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to describe current perioperative practices, and surgeons’ awareness and perception of perioperative frailty management, and barriers to its implementation. Methods A qualitative cross-sectional survey was sent via the World Society of Emergency Surgery e-letter to their members. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and reported by themes: risk scoring systems, frailty awareness and assessment and barriers to implementation. Results Of 168/1000 respondents, 38% were aware of the terms “Perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery” (POPS) and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). 66.6% of respondents assessed perioperative risk, with 45.2% using the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA-PS). 77.8% of respondents mostly agreed or agreed with the statement that they routinely conducted medical comorbidity management, and pain and falls risk assessment during emergency surgical admissions. Although 98.2% of respondents agreed that frailty was important, only 2.4% performed CGA and 1.2% used a specific frailty screening tool. Clinical frailty score (CFS) was the most commonly used tool by those who did. Screening was usually conducted by surgical trainees. Key barriers included lack of knowledge around frailty assessment, a lack of clarity on who should be responsible for frailty screening, and lack of trained staff. Conclusions Our study highlights the ubiquitous lack of awareness regarding frailty assessment and the POPS model of care. More training and clear guidelines on frailty scoring, alongside support by multidisciplinary teams may reduce the burden on surgical trainees, potentially improving rates of appropriate frailty assessment and management of the frailty syndrome in emergency surgical patients.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference25 articles.

1. Centre for Perioperative Care. Perioperative Care for Older People undergoing Surgery Network (POPS) | Centre for Perioperative Care [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: https://cpoc.org.uk/perioperative-care-older-people-undergoing-surgery-network-pops

2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian hospital statistics 2012–13. Health services series no. 54. Cat. no. HSE 145. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.

3. Lin HS, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: A systematic review. BMC Geriatr [Internet]. 2016 Aug 31 [cited 2022 Jun 18];16(1):1–12. Available from: https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-016-0329-8

4. Centre for perioperative care. Guideline for Perioperative Care for People Living with Frailty Undergoing Elective and Emergency Surgery [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.cpoc.org.uk/sites/cpoc/files/documents/2021-09/CPOC-BGS-Frailty-Guideline-2021.pdf

5. Rockwood K, Stadnyk K, MacKnight C, McDowell I, Hébert R, Hogan DB. A brief clinical instrument to classify frailty in elderly people. Vol. 353, Lancet (London, England). England; 1999. p. 205–6.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3