Have we come to the end of the PROM? Wearable sensors highlight improved rate of recovery and range of movement following robotic-assisted TKA that are overlooked by conventional PROMs

Author:

Zaidi Faseeh1,Bolam Scott M.1,Goplen Craig M.2,Yeung Ted1,Hanlon Michael2,Munro Jacob2,Besier Thor F.1,Monk Andrew P.2

Affiliation:

1. University of Auckland

2. Auckland City Hospital

Abstract

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate early outcomes of patients that underwent robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) and conventional TKA using wearable sensors and traditional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This was a prospective, matched, parallel cohort study of 100 patients with symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA (44 RA-TKA, 56 conventional TKA). Functional outcomes were assessed using ankle-worn inertial measurement units (IMUs). IMU-based outcomes included impact load, impact asymmetry, maximum knee flexion angle, and bone stimulus. PROMs, including Oxford Knee Score, EuroQol-Five Dimension, EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale, and Forgotten Joint Score, were evaluated at pre-operative baseline, weeks 2 to 6 post-operatively, and at 3-months and 1-year follow-up. By post-operative week 6, RA-TKA patients showed improved function compared to the conventional TKA group, with increased maximum knee flexion angle (118o ± 6.6o vs 113o ± 5.4o; p=0.04), improved symmetry in regard to limb loading (82.3% vs 22.4%; p<0.01), increased cumulative impact load (146.6% vs 37%; p<0.01), and increased bone stimulus (25.1% vs 13.6%; p<0.01). RA-TKA patients demonstrated an earlier return to symmetrical limb loading compared to conventional TKA by post-operative week 3. There were no differences in PROMs between the two groups at any timepoint. RA-TKAs were associated with faster return of normal gait and improved range of motion when assessed using IMUs compared to conventional TKA, which were not detected by traditional PROMs during the early post-operative period.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3