Triclosan Loaded pH-sensitive Vehicles Spray Facilitate Infected Wound Healing by Eliminating Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in Biofilm
Author:
Wang Changrong1, Huang Jinghua1, Lin Yifei1, Chen Xiangjun1, Li Wenting1, Zheng Shuna1, Zhang Yumin2, Li Keke1, Hong Wei1, Liu Jinjian2
Affiliation:
1. Binzhou Medical University 2. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Abstract
Abstract
The use of conventional antibiotics has rapidly declined due to the development of antibiotic resistance. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of novel vehicles to facilitate effective antibiotics delivery, especially for bacteria that form biofilm. Herein, we designed a library of pH-sensitive polymer vehicles with pKa values ranging from 6.2-5.0. We found that pKa values located into 5.3-5.7 displayed certain antibacterial effect and effective biofilm elimination. The antibacterial effect the copolymer vehicles is highly pKa dependent. Regardless of physical environment or pH 5.6 conditions, biofilm elimination improved silightly. Among the five vehicles, the copolymer (PEPB36/35) with pKa about 5.7 not only exhibited the best biosafety, but also significantly improved the biocompatibility of antibiotics triclosan (TCS). Moreover, PEPB36/35 nanoparticles (NPs) destroyed cell membranes and promoted cargos into cells under an acidic environment. The formed of PEPB36/35@TCS NPs spray was able to kill Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in biofilm and accelerate infected wound healing, which reduced inflammation and promoted angiogenesis. Collectively, these findings affirm that the designed pH-sensitive vehicles improve antibacterial efficacy of TCS in killing bacteria in biofilm.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Z. Wang, K. Dong, Z. Liu, Y. Zhang, H. Sun, J. Ren and X. Qu, Biomaterials, 2017, 113, 145–157. 2. X. Ding, S. Duan, X. Ding, R. Liu and F. Xu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 10. 3. K. E. Jones, N. G. Patel, M. A. Levy, A. Storeygard, D. Balk, J. L. Gittleman and R. Daszak, Nature, 2008, 451, 990–993. 4. G. Taubes, Science, 2008, 321, 356–361. 5. Y. Ding, Z. Li, C. Xu, W. Qin, Q. Wu, X. Wang, L. Li and W. Huang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 60, 24–40.
|
|