The optimum number of induction chemotherapy cycles for N3M0 stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA

Author:

Weng Youliang1,Cai Sunqin1,Li Chao2,Xu Yun1,Pan Yuhui1,Huang Zongwei1,Li Ying1,Wu Zijie1,Chen Yu3,Qiu Sufang1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital

2. Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Sanming City

3. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to examine the significance of pre-treatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA (pre-DNA) in determining the optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles (ICC) prior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with stage N3M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods In this research, we used propensity score matching to divide enrolled patients into 3 cycles (IC = 3) or 4 cycles (IC = 4) group based on the number of ICC. To assess the disparity in survival and toxicities, the log-rank and chi-squared tests were employed, respectively. The main endpoint was distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Additional endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS). Multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis identified potential independent prognostic factors. Results Of 369 patients, 194 were enrolled, with 97 and 97 included in IC = 3 and IC = 4 group respectively. The IC = 4 group exhibited markedly superior 3-year OS, PFS, DMFS, and LRRFS compared to the IC = 3 group (all p < 0.05), while experiencing higher adverse reactions, although not statistically significant. Based on DMFS, the cut-off value of pre-DNA was 8700 copies/ml (area under curve, 0.593; sensitivity, 0.794; specificity, 0.481). For low-risk patients with pre-DNA < 8700 copies/ml, both groups demonstrated comparable survival results. Nonetheless, the IC = 4 group exhibited better survival in 3-year OS, PFS, DMFS, and LRRFS compared to the IC = 3 group among high-risk patients with pre-DNA ≥ 8700 copies/ml (78.2% vs 49.1%, 69.1% vs 40.0%, 74.5% vs 40.0%, 70.9% vs 47.3%, all p < 0.05). Additionally, in high-risk group, ICC was considered as a protective element for OS and DMFS according to multivariate analysis. Conclusions For N3M0 stage NPC, pre-DNA could be a powerful predictor to guide the optimum number of ICC. IC = 4 was recommended for high-risk patients due to superior survival, while for low-risk patients, IC = 3 might be sufficient.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference31 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3