Affiliation:
1. NTUA: Ethniko Metsobio Polytechneio
2. National Technical University of Athens: Ethniko Metsobio Polytechneio
3. University of Granada: Universidad de Granada
Abstract
Abstract
Five different design approaches are compared on a single mid-rise reinforced concrete building, pitting two performance-based designs against three conventional methods in delivering a solution that satisfies different sets of performance objectives. Two of the conventional designs stem from the literature, and they represent 2003 IBC compatible solutions. Another employs yield point spectra to deliver a code-like solution, satisfying the design norms without needing iterations. The final two are based on the yield frequency spectra to offer a design that can satisfy more detailed performance objectives in a single step. Overall, all five methods are shown to deliver what is expected. Conventional methods can safely capture the code requirements, yet they are disadvantaged when treading in beyond-life-safety territory, where Immediate Occupancy or Collapse Prevention objectives cannot be easily satisfied, a problem that is not shared by performance-based approaches.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. ASCE (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7–10, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA
2. ASCE (2013) Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. ASCE/SEI 41 – 13. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia
3. Seismic Design Based on the Yield Displacement;Aschheim M;Earthq Spec,2002
4. Yield point spectra for seismic design and rehabilitation;Aschheim M;Earthq Spec,2000
5. Aschheim M, Hernández-Montes E, Vamvatsikos D (2019) Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings for Seismic performance: Practical, deterministic and probabilistic approaches. CRC Press. 10.1201/b19964
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献