The Impact of Vagal Nerve Stimulation From the Lateral Neck Region on Venous Canulation Pain: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Author:

Adıgüzel Şenay Canikli1,Soydan Emre Can1,Kayıkçı Ebru1,Süren Mustafa1,Okan İsmail2

Affiliation:

1. Samsun University

2. İstanbul Medeniyet University

Abstract

Abstract

Background As the cranial nerve with the longest and widest distribution area of the body, the vagus nerve (N.Vagus) has both antinociceptive and neuromodulatory effects and plays a role in the regulation of the heart rate. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of cold stimulation on vascular access discomfort and heart rate variability, specifically by separately stimulating the N. Vagus nerve on both the right and left sides of the neck thereby assessing any lateralization effect. Methods 140 patients, ranging in age from 18 to 75, were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group Left (Group L) or Group Right (Group R). Following cold application to the left lateral neck region of Group L and the right lateral neck region of Group R, venous cannulation was performed. Prior to, following, and subsequent to vascular access, the heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and numeric pain scale (NRS) values for venous cannulation pain of the patients were documented. Results Average heart rates and average heart rates after cannulation were considerably lower in both groups after vagal stimulation (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed when comparing the average heart rate values for each time period in Group L and Group R, including the mean heart rate values before vagal stimulation, after vagal stimulation, and after vascular access (p > 0.05). The mean heart rate change percentages before and after vagal stimulation were 7 ± 5.8% and 7.1 ± 7.0% in group L and group R respectively, suggesting that heart rate variability was greater in Group R, although this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). NRS values were found to be 2.64 ± 1.28 in Group L and 2.85 ± 1.62 in Group R, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusion While heart rate variability exhibited more prominence on the right side, the difference was not statistically significant. Analyzing the analgesic impact revealed no discernible difference between the analgesic effects of stimulation from the right and left sides.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3