Using the sociotechnical model to conduct a focused usability assessment of a breast reconstruction decision tool

Author:

Foraker Randi1,Phommasathit Crystal2,Clevenger Kaleigh2,Lee Clara2,Boateng Jessica1,Shareef Napiera2,Politi Mary1

Affiliation:

1. Washington University in St. Louis

2. The Ohio State University

Abstract

Abstract Background: BREASTChoice is a web-based decision tool about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. The current focused usability assessment was designed to elicit patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on barriers and facilitators for implementing BREASTChoice into the clinical workflow. Methods: We conducted think-aloud protocols and qualitative interviews with patients and clinicians from two Midwestern medical centers from August 2020 to April 2021. We used the sociotechnical framework to evaluate BREASTChoice’s implementation and sustainability potential according to end-users, human-computer interaction, and contextual factors. Results: Twelve clinicians and ten patients completed interviews. Using the sociotechnical framework, we determined the following. People Using the Tool: Patients and clinicians agreed that BREASTChoice could help patients make more informed decisions about their reconstruction, and prepare better for their first plastic surgery appointment. Workflow and Communications: They felt that BREASTChoice could improve communication and the decision process if the patient could view the tool before the clinical visit. Clinicians suggested the information from BREASTChoice about patients’ risks and preferences be included in the patient’s chart or the clinician electronic health record (EHR) inbox for accessibility during the consultation. Human Computer Interface: Patients and clinicians stated that the tool contains helpful information, does not require much time for the patient to use, and efficiently fills gaps in knowledge. Although patients found the risk profile information helpful, they reported needing time to read and digest it. Conclusion: BREASTChoice was perceived as highly usable by patients and clinicians and has the potential for sustainability. Future research will implement and test the tool after integrating the stakeholder-suggested changes to its delivery process and content. It is critical to conduct usability assessments such as these prior to decision tool implementation in order to improve workflow and risk communication.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3